Skip to content

Conversation

@hanhsuan
Copy link
Contributor

@hanhsuan hanhsuan commented Aug 5, 2025

Description

This PR refactors the dock test to make it easier and provides wilder coverage.

  1. separate manifest from non dock test plans to ensure the manifest won't mislead
  2. add new init-connection test case as the root dependency for all jobs to ensure the real init connection test is executed.
  3. add new test sets suspend-hotplug to ensure dock could work after hotplug under suspend.
  4. add new all-*-ethernet-detect as dependency of all-*-networking-gateway-ping and all-*-networking-ntp to archive the manifest separating.
  5. add certification-status=blocker to all test cases
  6. modify wording to make the description and verification more clear.
image

Resolved issues

https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/OEMQA-6118

Documentation

Tests

https://certification.canonical.com/hardware/202503-36528/submission/441901/

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.86%. Comparing base (fec2b5c) to head (aabedf5).
⚠️ Report is 95 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2065   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.86%   51.86%           
=======================================
  Files         387      387           
  Lines       41674    41674           
  Branches     7741     7741           
=======================================
  Hits        21613    21613           
  Misses      19294    19294           
  Partials      767      767           
Flag Coverage Δ
provider-base 27.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

GabrielChenCC
GabrielChenCC previously approved these changes Aug 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@GabrielChenCC GabrielChenCC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. @hanhsuan thanks.

clairlin53
clairlin53 previously approved these changes Aug 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@clairlin53 clairlin53 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM+1

@hanhsuan hanhsuan marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 02:35
Copy link
Contributor

@GabrielChenCC GabrielChenCC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@scotthu27 scotthu27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM+1

Copy link
Contributor

@clairlin53 clairlin53 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM+1

@Hook25 Hook25 merged commit eab8061 into main Aug 8, 2025
36 checks passed
@Hook25 Hook25 deleted the refactor_docking_test branch August 8, 2025 07:33
stanley31huang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
* refactor docking test

* Improving the test steps description

* modify the description of _purpose and _verification
bladernr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
* refactor docking test

* Improving the test steps description

* modify the description of _purpose and _verification
stanley31huang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
* refactor docking test

* Improving the test steps description

* modify the description of _purpose and _verification
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants