-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
musig2: Add adaptor signature support to MuSig2 protocol #2325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
martonp
wants to merge
3
commits into
btcsuite:master
Choose a base branch
from
martonp:musig2Adaptor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to do this in a loop? Can't we just take the inverse of the secret to get an even y coordinate if the first draw produces an odd one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A loop is needed because we want the adaptor point added to the combined nonce to be even, not just for the adaptor point to be even.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I understand that. But the evenness should be deterministic. So wouldn't it be possible to just invert the secret if we find out that (after adding the adaptor point to the nonce) it's not even, we can invert it instead of drawing a new value?
It's just that a for loop with no defined exit condition feels suboptimal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I completely missed your message.
Inverting the secret will not work, you can try this test function here:
There's no deterministic effect of the evenness of one of the points to the combined point. Maybe just incrementing the secret until we find a valid one, rather than choosing a new random number, would be more performant, but I'm not aware of a technique to avoid trying different points until we encounter one that works.