Skip to content

Conversation

@daichengxin
Copy link
Collaborator

@daichengxin daichengxin commented Nov 27, 2025

PR Type

Other


Description

  • Add blank line after get_unimod_database() function

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["dianncfg.py"] -- "add blank line" --> B["improved code formatting"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Formatting
dianncfg.py
Add blank line after function definition                                 

quantmsutils/diann/dianncfg.py

  • Add blank line after get_unimod_database() function definition
  • Improves code readability and PEP 8 compliance
+1/-0     

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@daichengxin daichengxin merged commit 8aea86b into bigbio:dev Nov 27, 2025
1 of 3 checks passed
@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status:
No new logging: The PR only adds a blank line and introduces no new critical actions or logging, so
compliance cannot be assessed from the diff alone.

Referred Code
# Met-loss modification constant (UniMod:765) with mass shift and site specification

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status:
No error handling: The change only adds a blank line and provides no new failure points or handling to assess
robustness, so compliance cannot be determined.

Referred Code
# Met-loss modification constant (UniMod:765) with mass shift and site specification

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status:
No input changes: The PR adds only formatting, with no new inputs or data handling shown in the diff, so
security validation cannot be assessed.

Referred Code
# Met-loss modification constant (UniMod:765) with mass shift and site specification

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant