Skip to content

Conversation

@sssruhan1
Copy link

Hi,

I implemented the eval_pck.m to a python version and tested it on the hg4 given model and results. The results looks identical to the one provided on README.

The util.py contains one function, visualize, basically to draw skeletons to the image.
The eval_pck.py contains the exact same code in python version.

Thank you!

Copy link
Owner

@bearpaw bearpaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! Thanks for contributing!

@bearpaw bearpaw merged commit 4dec9f9 into bearpaw:master Jun 28, 2017
@bearpaw
Copy link
Owner

bearpaw commented Jul 3, 2017

@sssruhan1 Hi, there is a little bug when computing the mean PCKh. I have updated your pull request. Please have a look. Thanks!

@sssruhan1
Copy link
Author

Looks good. Thank you!

@wangyarui
Copy link

Hi, thanks for your contributes, I met some issues, My annotated labels of GT's file is aboult 3k, but my annotated labels of DT's file is about 2k9, and they are not match. And can't I evaluate them?

 uv_error = pos_pred_src - pos_gt_src
ValueError: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (14,2,1743) (1917,14,2) 

Thanks very much!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants