-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
Add support for Permissions Boundary on Function #782
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Permissions Boundary on Function #782
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #782 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 94.71% 94.22% -0.49%
===========================================
Files 67 67
Lines 2950 2686 -264
Branches 578 478 -100
===========================================
- Hits 2794 2531 -263
- Misses 78 80 +2
+ Partials 78 75 -3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great! For Globals, check out this PR which added Auth to Globals https://github.com/awslabs/serverless-application-model/pull/682/files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving this as it looks good in its current form, though Globals support would be a great addition.
Updated with globals support. Cheers! |
tox>=2.2.1 | ||
pytest-cov>=2.4.0 | ||
pylint>=1.7.2 | ||
pylint>=1.7.2,<2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any particular reason why this was necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pip was trying to install a post 2.0 version which required py3.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh ok, thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Thanks for this contribution!
Issue #, if available:
#661
Description of changes:
Adds support for specifying permissions boundary on a serverless function. Includes test templates
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.