Align behaviour of default table creation between sync and async table

[zakerf]

Motivation and Context

While migrating a project from the sync client to the async one I noticed failing tests in our project because of missing indices. We relied on createTable() to create the table in tests and after diving into it I saw that the secondary indices we have are not being created with the async variation.

Modifications

This adds the behaviour introduced in the sync DDB table to the async version as well. See commit ef2aa90 for original code

Testing

Haven't added any new code and the existing code already has proper unit tests

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• [ x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

• [ x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• [ x] Local run of mvn install succeeds
• [ x] My code follows the code style of this project
• My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
• I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• [ x] All new and existing tests passed
• [ x] I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
• My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

• [ x] I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

[zakerf]

@L-Applin, I see you approved the original PR that this change is also based on, any chance you could look at this one?

[debora-ito]

Closing in favor of #5847.

@zakerf we appreciate you sending us the PR.