Skip to content

Conversation

zhu-xiaowei
Copy link
Contributor

Description

fix: readme global attribute code alignment

General Checklist

  • Added new tests to cover change, if needed
  • Security oriented best practices and standards are followed (e.g. using input sanitization, principle of least privilege, etc)
  • Documentation update for the change if required
  • PR title conforms to conventional commit style
  • If breaking change, documentation/changelog update with migration instructions

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@zhu-xiaowei zhu-xiaowei added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 27, 2023
@zhu-xiaowei zhu-xiaowei requested a review from zxkane October 27, 2023 05:42
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (51698de) 100.00% compared to head (9e2b5a1) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #33   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           24        24           
  Lines          995       995           
  Branches       183       183           
=========================================
  Hits           995       995           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@zxkane zxkane changed the title fix: readme global attribute code alignment chore: readme global attribute code alignment Oct 27, 2023
@zxkane zxkane merged commit ef4e5ed into main Oct 27, 2023
@zxkane zxkane deleted the fix-readme branch October 27, 2023 06:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants