chore: add workspace flag to package script

[Muthuveerappanv]

Description of your changes

As detailed in the linked issue, the package script present in the main package.json currently causes a recursion. This PR modifies the command to include the -ws flag so that the command is run in each one of the workspace packages.

Fixes #1343.

How to verify this change

Run the command after checking out the branch locally & confirm that the package command is called in each package of the workspace.

Related issues, RFCs

Issue number: #1343

Checklist

• My changes meet the tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code where necessary, particularly in areas that should be flagged with a TODO, or hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have made corresponding changes to the examples
• My changes generate no new warnings
• The code coverage hasn't decreased
• I have added tests that prove my change is effective and works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally and in Github Actions
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published
• The PR title follows the conventional commit semantics

Breaking change checklist

Is it a breaking change?: NO

• I have documented the migration process
• I have added, implemented necessary warnings (if it can live side by side)

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[dreamorosi]

Running the command with the proposed change causes the command to fail:

This is due to one of the workspace packages not having the package command. The command wasn't there because of what mentioned in the second paragraph of this comment (TL;DR; this package command at there root level is not really used).

Please add a line like this to the docs/snippets/package.json file and try running the command again locally, then please attach a screenshot to PR body under the "How to verify this change" section.

[dreamorosi]

Hi @Muthuveerappanv thank you for opening this PR.

I have left a couple of comments that need to be addressed before we can merge it.

Also, please review the comments I have left in the linked issue around contributing and note that I took the liberty to edit the PR description so that it aligns with the requirements/instructions that are written in the PR comments.

[dreamorosi]

Thank you for the changes and for addressing my comments.

I'll merge this later today.