generated from amazon-archives/__template_Apache-2.0
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
Open
Labels
batchThis item relates to the Batch Processing UtilityThis item relates to the Batch Processing UtilityconfirmedThe scope is clear, ready for implementationThe scope is clear, ready for implementationinternalPRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.)PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.)
Description
Summary
Following the v2.26.0
release we introduced a regression that couldn't be detected in unit tests and existing e2e tests.
Because of this, we should add isolated and dedicated test cases for the Batch Processing utility.
Why is this needed?
So that we can increase the confidence that new code in this utility stays backwards compatible and with less chances of regressions.
Which area does this relate to?
Other
Solution
No response
Acknowledgment
- This request meets Powertools for AWS Lambda (TypeScript) Tenets
- Should this be considered in other Powertools for AWS Lambda languages? i.e. Python, Java, and .NET
Future readers
Please react with 👍 and your use case to help us understand customer demand.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
batchThis item relates to the Batch Processing UtilityThis item relates to the Batch Processing UtilityconfirmedThe scope is clear, ready for implementationThe scope is clear, ready for implementationinternalPRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.)PRs that introduce changes in governance, tech debt and chores (linting setup, baseline, etc.)
Type
Projects
Status
Backlog