Skip to content

Conversation

@xinrong-meng
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Now that we merged the Koalas main code into the PySpark code base (#32036), we should port the Koalas miscellaneous unit tests to PySpark.

Why are the changes needed?

Currently, the pandas-on-Spark modules are not tested fully. We should enable miscellaneous unit tests.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Enable miscellaneous unit tests.

@xinrong-meng xinrong-meng changed the title [WIP]SPARK-35034][PYTHON] Port Koalas miscellaneous unit tests into PySpark [SPARK-35034][PYTHON] Port Koalas miscellaneous unit tests into PySpark Apr 13, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ueshin ueshin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, pending tests.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 13, 2021

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/41884/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 13, 2021

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/41884/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 13, 2021

Test build #137304 has finished for PR 32152 at commit 6b2d157.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@ueshin
Copy link
Member

ueshin commented Apr 13, 2021

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 14, 2021

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/41890/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 14, 2021

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/41890/

Copy link
Contributor

@itholic itholic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if test passes

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 14, 2021

Test build #137310 has finished for PR 32152 at commit 6b2d157.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. can we resolve the conflicts?

@xinrong-meng
Copy link
Member Author

@HyukjinKwon Certainly, the conflict has been resolved!

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 14, 2021

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/41937/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 14, 2021

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/41937/

@github-actions
Copy link

Test build #748860054 for PR 32152 at commit 48a17d9.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 14, 2021

Test build #137358 has finished for PR 32152 at commit 48a17d9.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
  • trait AnalysisOnlyCommand extends Command
  • implicit class MetadataColumnHelper(attr: Attribute)

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants