Skip to content

Conversation

@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Address comment in #28707 (comment)

Why are the changes needed?

Hide the implementation details in the config doc.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Config doc change.

How was this patch tested?

Document only.

@xuanyuanking xuanyuanking changed the title [SPARK-31894][SS][FOLLOW-UP] [SPARK-31894][SS][FOLLOW-UP] Rephrase the config doc Jul 31, 2020
@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

cc @cloud-fan

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

do we have the same problem in the error message?

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

cc @HeartSaVioR

@xuanyuanking
Copy link
Member Author

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28707/files#diff-238c6b2f820f62c556f204788d684584R150
I think the error message is clear, we don't use code name inside.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2020

Test build #126880 has finished for PR 29315 at commit a358345.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

This just updates the config doc and we don't need to wait for the test. Thanks, merging to master!

@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in 354313b Jul 31, 2020
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 31, 2020

Test build #126883 has finished for PR 29315 at commit 376989d.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@xuanyuanking xuanyuanking deleted the SPARK-31894-follow branch August 1, 2020 00:20
@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor

post +1. Thanks for the fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants