Skip to content

Conversation

@juliuszsompolski
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It appears I have unintentionally used nested JDBC statements in the two tests I added.

Why are the changes needed?

Cleanup a typo. Please merge to master/branch-3.0

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

@juliuszsompolski
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @cloud-fan @MaxGekk

Copy link
Member

@MaxGekk MaxGekk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 5, 2020

Test build #123558 has finished for PR 28735 at commit 07d59b8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merging to master/3.0!

@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in ea01013 Jun 5, 2020
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

It appears I have unintentionally used nested JDBC statements in the two tests I added.

### Why are the changes needed?

Cleanup a typo. Please merge to master/branch-3.0

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

Closes #28735 from juliuszsompolski/SPARK-31859-fixup.

Authored-by: Juliusz Sompolski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ea01013)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants