Skip to content

Conversation

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In #18600 we removed the metadata field from SparkPlanInfo. This causes a problem when we replay event logs that are generated by older Spark versions.

How was this patch tested?

a regression test.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @vanzin @gatorsmile

Copy link
Contributor

@vanzin vanzin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM pending tests and small nits.

* Stores information about a SQL SparkPlan.
*/
@DeveloperApi
@JsonIgnoreProperties(Array("metadata")) // The metadata filed was removed in Spark 2.3.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

field

assert(reconstructedEvent == expectedEvent)
}

private val SQLExecutionStartJsonString =
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Declare this inside the test since it's only used there? (Also would make it easier to match the test to the data if more tests are added.)

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 14, 2017

Test build #81791 has finished for PR 19237 at commit 414457c.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 15, 2017

Test build #81799 has finished for PR 19237 at commit 93cacba.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@gatorsmile gatorsmile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 3c6198c Sep 15, 2017
@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Merged to master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants