-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
HDFS-16430. Validate maximum blocks in EC group when adding an EC policy #3899
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
ayushtkn
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2022
Member
ayushtkn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for your review! @ayushtkn |
tomscut
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2022
Member
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2022
…an EC policy (#3899). Contributed by daimin. Reviewed-by: tomscut <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ayush Saxena <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5ef335d) Conflicts: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ErasureCodingPolicyManager.java
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2022
…an EC policy (#3899). Contributed by daimin. Reviewed-by: tomscut <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ayush Saxena <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5ef335d) Conflicts: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ErasureCodingPolicyManager.java (cherry picked from commit 728ed10)
bogthe
pushed a commit
to bogthe/hadoop
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2022
…an EC policy (apache#3899). Contributed by daimin. Reviewed-by: tomscut <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ayush Saxena <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5ef335d) Conflicts: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ErasureCodingPolicyManager.java
HarshitGupta11
pushed a commit
to HarshitGupta11/hadoop
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2022
…an EC policy (apache#3899). Contributed by daimin. Reviewed-by: tomscut <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ayush Saxena <[email protected]>
jojochuang
pushed a commit
to jojochuang/hadoop
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2023
…when adding an EC policy (apache#3899). Contributed by daimin. Reviewed-by: tomscut <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ayush Saxena <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5ef335d) Conflicts: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ErasureCodingPolicyManager.java (cherry picked from commit 728ed10) Conflicts: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/ErasureCodingPolicyManager.java Change-Id: Id779f8e3a16350d9793f079087ae30278b13483a
LiuGuH
pushed a commit
to LiuGuH/hadoop
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
…an EC policy (apache#3899). Contributed by daimin. Reviewed-by: tomscut <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ayush Saxena <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HDFS EC adopts the last 4 bits of block ID to store the block index in EC block group. Therefore maximum blocks in EC block group is
2^4=16, and which is defined here:HdfsServerConstants#MAX_BLOCKS_IN_GROUP.Currently there is no limitation or warning when adding a bad EC policy with
numDataUnits + numParityUnits > 16. It only results in read/write error on EC file with bad EC policy. To users this is not very straightforward.