Skip to content

Conversation

@lewiszlw
Copy link
Member

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

In our case, we need put type data in schema metadata for supporting logical type. But there is no good way for the column generated by UDF.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the logical-expr Logical plan and expressions label Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @lewiszlw

}

/// Returns the field metadata for this function.
pub fn metadata(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels similar in usecase to #13290 -- if we merged #13290 would that solve your usecase?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like not. This pr is for supporting custom metadata when converting scalar function expr to schema field during planing.

true
}

/// Returns the field metadata for this function.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a more detailed explanation would be useful for someone adding a new UDF to know why this method exists and what use case it is trying to solve. Without looking at this PR it's pretty opaque.

@Omega359
Copy link
Contributor

I think a test would be in order that would showcase why the new metadata method exists and what problem it solves.

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Nov 25, 2024

I think a test would be in order that would showcase why the new metadata method exists and what problem it solves.

I agree.

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Nov 27, 2024

Marking as draft as I think this PR is no longer waiting on feedback. Please mark it as ready for review when it is ready for another look

@alamb alamb marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2024 19:11
@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale PR has not had any activity for some time label Jan 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

logical-expr Logical plan and expressions Stale PR has not had any activity for some time

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants