Skip to content

Conversation

Dandandan
Copy link
Contributor

@Dandandan Dandandan commented Sep 5, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #12349

Rationale for this change

Possible performance improvements when input plans contain nullable fields.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the optimizer Optimizer rules label Sep 5, 2024
///
/// See [`lr_is_preserved`] for a definition of "preserved".
fn on_lr_is_preserved(join_type: JoinType) -> Result<(bool, bool)> {
pub(crate) fn on_lr_is_preserved(join_type: JoinType) -> (bool, bool) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that lgtm thanks @Dandandan

@Dandandan Dandandan merged commit 41b10ca into apache:main Sep 6, 2024
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
optimizer Optimizer rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Push down null filters for other types than inner join
2 participants