Skip to content

chore: move cdk dialog to cdk-experimental #9285

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

devversion
Copy link
Member

  • Moves the cdk dialog package from material-experimental to the cdk-experimental package.

* Moves the cdk dialog package from `material-experimental` to the `cdk-experimental` package.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jan 8, 2018
Copy link
Member

@josephperrott josephperrott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Was planning to do this today. Thanks!

@josephperrott josephperrott added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels Jan 8, 2018
@andrewseguin andrewseguin merged commit 2957d58 into angular:master Jan 12, 2018
andrewseguin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2018
* Moves the cdk dialog package from `material-experimental` to the `cdk-experimental` package.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants