-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.4k
Conversation
Added support for transition-delay property.
Pretty cool! I'm happy to rebase my PR (#2381) on top of that if there will be an official statement. /cc @IgorMinar @mhevery |
Ah actually, I think you should rebase on mine since there can also be multiple delays. |
Hey - you'll have to forgive my ignorance :) How do I rebase my patch against your branch/pull request? |
We probably first wait for an official statement from the core team. But to answer your question, it goes like this:
But before you do that, let's wait for an official statement ;-) |
That's great - thanks for the instructions... I'm still a relative newbie when it comes to Git :) Will wait for an official statement before making any more changes 👍 |
This looks good to me. As @cburgdorf suggests you should probabyl build it on top of his PR. It will also need unit tests and a better commit message. Take a look at the commit message guidelines: commit message format. |
There is one trap I think. E.g. when we animate on the properties
then the overall time spent is |
Nice spot! You're right, the patch would have to take into account the combined duration+delay if multiple times are specified. |
yep, you can see in my PR that I also already added a test that takes multiple durations into account. I guess once you rebased, you should more or less copy that test and then provide a situation as described in my previous comment. If you have any trouble I'm happy to help :) |
Closing this as the work seems to have moved over to #2381 |
Added support for transition-delay property.