Skip to content

Conversation

@opalmer
Copy link
Contributor

@opalmer opalmer commented Oct 13, 2016

See #18 for details.

@opalmer opalmer added the bug label Oct 13, 2016
@opalmer opalmer added this to the 0.1.1 milestone Oct 13, 2016
@opalmer opalmer self-assigned this Oct 13, 2016
@opalmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

opalmer commented Oct 13, 2016

@andygrunwald, @perolausson PTAL. So far as I can tell, this change should fix the issue brought up in #18.

I'm not sure this is the best approach but neither net/url or github.com/google/go-querystring/query appear to have a way of excluding some symbols from parsing and writing our own from scratch didn't seem ideal either.

@andygrunwald
Copy link
Owner

I am on a trip until 21st October. I try to have a look at it in between,
but I am not sure if I can afford this. The trip is quite busy and tough.

If you are sure that this will fix it and (even better) provide a unit /
regression test with it: Go for it.

@opalmer you know I trust you in this project :) so we are equal :)

Am Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2016 schrieb opalmer :

@andygrunwald https://github.com/andygrunwald, @perolausson
https://github.com/perolausson PTAL. So far as I can tell, this change
should fix the issue discovered in #18
#18.

I'm not sure this is the best approach but neither net/url or
github.com/google/go-querystring/query appear to have a way of excluding
some symbols from parsing and writing our own from scratch didn't seem
ideal either.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#22 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATiQOd0SDUhEZ69yy-1FvP8LpBv4o8gks5qziRCgaJpZM4KV0y2
.

@opalmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

opalmer commented Oct 13, 2016

If you are sure that this will fix it and (even better) provide a unit / regression test with it: Go for it.

Already added a test in d703d14 for exactly this :). Prior to the fix this new unittest would have failed.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 15, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 11.227% when pulling 33fa8c5 on fix_url_encoding into 2b0558c on master.

@opalmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

opalmer commented Oct 23, 2016

@perolausson, have you had a chance to test this?

@perolausson
Copy link
Contributor

No I'm sorry. Snowed under.

On 23 Oct 2016 16:17, "opalmer" [email protected] wrote:

@perolausson https://github.com/perolausson, have you had a chance to
test this?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#22 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC2X-KkAwliK001joX8EiaygQeT25JhHks5q23qFgaJpZM4KV0y2
.

@opalmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

opalmer commented Oct 31, 2016

@perolausson, any chance you could take a look at this sometime this week?

@opalmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

opalmer commented Nov 3, 2016

I'm going to go ahead and merge this within the next couple of days if there are not any objections. The testing I've done seems to indicate this will fix the original problem without causing any new ones. If that turns out to not be the case it's pretty easy to either roll this back or apply a patch.

@andygrunwald
Copy link
Owner

Go ahead @opalmer.
Thx for your effort

@opalmer opalmer merged commit 8adc2df into master Nov 5, 2016
@opalmer opalmer deleted the fix_url_encoding branch November 5, 2016 03:52
dmitshur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
This special behavior for the "+" character was added as part of PR #22
to resolve issue #18 around 9 years ago, but the issue described there
seems more like a problem caused by "+" being used instead of " "
(a space) in the original search query, and we haven't received new
information to suggest otherwise. So, undo the special behavior for the
"+" character.

GitHub-Pull-Request: #193
@andygrunwald
Copy link
Owner

See #193 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants