Skip to content

Conversation

vad710
Copy link

@vad710 vad710 commented Sep 18, 2025

  • Updated to use free googleAI() backend
  • Updated to use newer model
  • Fixed an issue with FunctionResponses missing the function call ID

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @vad710, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the Gemini Live Todo sample application by migrating its AI backend to the free googleAI() service and upgrading to a more recent Gemini model. A significant fix addresses the omission of functionCall.id in FunctionResponses, which is vital for the correct operation of function calling. Additionally, new logging statements have been introduced to provide better visibility into the application's audio conversation and function execution flow.

Highlights

  • Backend Update: The Gemini model backend has been switched from vertexAI() to the free googleAI() backend.
  • Model Version Upgrade: The application now utilizes a newer Gemini model, specifically gemini-live-2.5-flash-preview, replacing the older gemini-2.0-flash-live-preview-04-09.
  • FunctionResponse Fix: An issue where FunctionResponses were missing the crucial functionCall.id has been resolved, ensuring proper function call handling.
  • Improved Logging: Enhanced logging has been added to track the start and stop of audio conversations, as well as the execution of function calls, aiding in debugging and monitoring.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Gemini Live Todo sample to use a newer model and backend, and correctly includes the function call ID in function responses. The changes are functional and address the described issues. I have provided a few suggestions to improve code style by removing excessive blank lines, and a more significant refactoring suggestion for the handleFunctionCall method to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant