-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
install to site packages instead of user appdata #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Does it work on both Mac and Linux? Mac has some write protection issues with binaries and Linux uses its system Python for Blender. There's also 'modules' folder right next to the 'scripts' folder inside Blender that could possibly work. Also is the static path to Python lib/site-packages in the Python stable API? Or is it something that can break later. |
|
since i don't have mac and linux, i d need someone to test this. I would assume it works since we get the paths from python and blender, which both are compatible with mac & linux.
the site packages live inside that folder :) |
not sure what the best way here would be |
|
I tested it on Linux and it does not work. The install of Python modules through PIP works fine but it goes into a wrong folder, thus Blender being unable to load them. |
|
that's unfortenate. what do you think would be a good way to handle this? |
|
recently found out about it's a userscript path handled by blender. so should be supported on all OS |
should support all OS since path is handled by blender now
doesn't seem to be imported anywhere
|
could you have another test on mac and linux? tested on windows |
|
i've also removed init_utils.bat sicne it doesn't seem to be used anywhere, and is probably not relevant to this addon |
|
been using |
72496a7 to
6a415ec
Compare
fix for #9
blender pip now installs to the blender modules folder.
specifically, site packages, which keeps it separated from the default python modules included with blender