Null invalid PostalCode

[jeff-hernandez]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1467 (6d356e0) into main (16f52ea) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1467   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.69%   98.69%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines       10620    10654   +34     
=======================================
+ Hits        10481    10515   +34     
  Misses        139      139           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
woodwork/logical_types.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
woodwork/tests/logical_types/test_logical_types.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 16f52ea...6d356e0. Read the comment docs.

[ParthivNaresh]

Looks sold to me! I'm a little concerned about Panda's inconsistency in null type handling and it feels like we're constantly making small changes to support, handle, assign, compare, and convert pd.NA. Its ambiguity is something we have to keep an eye on.