Get rid of extensionality in FST #40
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since agda-stdlib version 2.0 (specifically commit 367e3d620a8512a36e2916dc081cdf300593f749) ⊥ is defined irrelevant. Hence, Agda considers all proofs of ⊥ judgementally equal.
pmbittner
approved these changes
May 31, 2024
Member
pmbittner
left a comment
pmbittner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great! Please merge (in the order you prefer). :)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since agda-stdlib version 2.0 (specifically commit 367e3d620a8512a36e2916dc081cdf300593f749) ⊥ is defined irrelevant. Hence, Agda considers all proofs of ⊥ judgementally equal.
Note that I haven't removed
src/Axioms/Extensionality.agdabecause #39 reintroduces its usage 😅