ERROR: LoadError: UndefVarError: undefmatrix not defined

[ranocha]

We get the following error in our CI runs:

  ✗ NonlinearSolve
  ✗ OrdinaryDiffEq
  183 dependencies successfully precompiled in 569 seconds
  2 dependencies errored. To see a full report either run `import Pkg; Pkg.precompile()` or load the packages
...
ERROR: LoadError: UndefVarError: undefmatrix not defined
Stacktrace:
  [1] jacobian_caches(alg::NonlinearSolve.TrustRegion{0, true, Val{:forward}, Nothing, typeof(NonlinearSolve.DEFAULT_PRECS), true, nothing, Rational{Int64}}, f::Function, u::Float32, p::Float32, #unused#::Val{false})
    @ NonlinearSolve ~/.julia/packages/NonlinearSolve/VEpTU/src/trustRegion.jl:213
  [2] __init(::SciMLBase.NonlinearProblem{Float32, false, Float32, SciMLBase.NonlinearFunction{false, SciMLBase.FullSpecialize, NonlinearSolve.var"#16#18", LinearAlgebra.UniformScaling{Bool}, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, typeof(SciMLBase.DEFAULT_OBSERVED_NO_TIME), Nothing, Nothing}, Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}}, SciMLBase.StandardNonlinearProblem}, ::NonlinearSolve.TrustRegion{0, true, Val{:forward}, Nothing, typeof(NonlinearSolve.DEFAULT_PRECS), true, nothing, Rational{Int64}}; alias_u0::Bool, maxiters::Int64, abstol::Float32, internalnorm::Function, kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}})
    @ NonlinearSolve ~/.julia/packages/NonlinearSolve/VEpTU/src/trustRegion.jl:239
  [3] #init_call#18
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DiffEqBase/wtukj/src/solve.jl:412 [inlined]
  [4] #init_up#21
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DiffEqBase/wtukj/src/solve.jl:462 [inlined]
  [5] #init#19
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DiffEqBase/wtukj/src/solve.jl:425 [inlined]
  [6] __solve(::SciMLBase.NonlinearProblem{Float32, false, Float32, SciMLBase.NonlinearFunction{false, SciMLBase.FullSpecialize, NonlinearSolve.var"#16#18", LinearAlgebra.UniformScaling{Bool}, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, typeof(SciMLBase.DEFAULT_OBSERVED_NO_TIME), Nothing, Nothing}, Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}}, SciMLBase.StandardNonlinearProblem}, ::NonlinearSolve.TrustRegion{0, true, Val{:forward}, Nothing, typeof(NonlinearSolve.DEFAULT_PRECS), true, nothing, Rational{Int64}}; kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Float32, Tuple{Symbol}, NamedTuple{(:abstol,), Tuple{Float32}}})
    @ NonlinearSolve ~/.julia/packages/NonlinearSolve/VEpTU/src/NonlinearSolve.jl:30
  [7] #solve_call#22
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DiffEqBase/wtukj/src/solve.jl:496 [inlined]
  [8] #solve_up#29
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DiffEqBase/wtukj/src/solve.jl:927 [inlined]
  [9] #solve#28
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DiffEqBase/wtukj/src/solve.jl:886 [inlined]
 [10] macro expansion
    @ ~/.julia/packages/NonlinearSolve/VEpTU/src/NonlinearSolve.jl:53 [inlined]
 [11] top-level scope
    @ ~/.julia/packages/SnoopPrecompile/1XXT1/src/SnoopPrecompile.jl:69
 [12] include
    @ ./Base.jl:418 [inlined]
 [13] include_package_for_output(pkg::Base.PkgId, input::String, depot_path::Vector{String}, dl_load_path::Vector{String}, load_path::Vector{String}, concrete_deps::Vector{Pair{Base.PkgId, UInt64}}, source::String)
    @ Base ./loading.jl:1318
 [14] top-level scope
    @ none:1
 [15] eval
    @ ./boot.jl:373 [inlined]
 [16] eval(x::Expr)
    @ Base.MainInclude ./client.jl:453
 [17] top-level scope
    @ none:1
in expression starting at /home/runner/.julia/packages/NonlinearSolve/VEpTU/src/NonlinearSolve.jl:1
ERROR: LoadError: Failed to precompile NonlinearSolve [8913a72c-1f9b-4ce2-8d82-6[509](https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi2Vtk.jl/actions/runs/4253970904/jobs/7399566972#step:6:512)4dcecaec] to /home/runner/.julia/compiled/v1.7/NonlinearSolve/jl_Wiq4lE.

See https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi2Vtk.jl/actions/runs/4253970904/jobs/7399566972#step:6:476

This CI run uses Julia v1.7.

[ranocha]

I can also reproduce it locally:

julia> using Pkg; Pkg.activate(temp = true); Pkg.add(["NonlinearSolve", "Trixi"])
...
  [8913a72c] + NonlinearSolve v1.4.0
  [a7f1ee26] + Trixi v0.5.12
...
Precompiling project...
  ✗ NonlinearSolve
  73 dependencies successfully precompiled in 185 seconds (92 already precompiled)
  1 dependency errored. To see a full report either run `import Pkg; Pkg.precompile()` or load the package

# same stacktrace as above

[ranocha]

It looks like this would be fixed by ArrayInterface.jl v6.0.24 or v6.0.25 - but we cannot update because StrideArrays.jl is not updated to Static.jl v0.8:

julia> using Pkg; Pkg.activate(temp = true); Pkg.add([
           PackageSpec(name = "NonlinearSolve"),
           PackageSpec(name = "ArrayInterface", version = v"6.0.24"),
           PackageSpec(name = "Trixi", version = v"0.5.12")])
  Activating new project at `/tmp/jl_GENCBl`
   Resolving package versions...
ERROR: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package Static [aedffcd0]:
 Static [aedffcd0] log:
 ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.8.4 or uninstalled
 ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with ArrayInterface [4fba245c] to versions: 0.8.0-0.8.4
 │ └─ArrayInterface [4fba245c] log:
 │   ├─possible versions are: 0.0.1-7.1.0 or uninstalled
 │   └─restricted to versions 6.0.24 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 6.0.24
 └─restricted by compatibility requirements with StrideArrays [d1fa6d79] to versions: [0.3.0-0.4.1, 0.6.0-0.7.8] — no versions left
   └─StrideArrays [d1fa6d79] log:
     ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.1.23 or uninstalled
     ├─restricted by julia compatibility requirements to versions: 0.1.0-0.1.21 or uninstalled
     ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with ArrayInterface [4fba245c] to versions: 0.1.17-0.1.23 or uninstalled, leaving only versions: 0.1.17-0.1.21 or uninstalled
     │ └─ArrayInterface [4fba245c] log: see above
     └─restricted by compatibility requirements with Trixi [a7f1ee26] to versions: 0.1.18-0.1.23, leaving only versions: 0.1.18-0.1.21
       └─Trixi [a7f1ee26] log:
         ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.5.12 or uninstalled
         └─restricted to versions 0.5.12 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 0.5.12

[ChrisRackauckas]

Yes it looks like we needed to have a higher bound than just 6. We can yank the release with v6 and make that have a lower bound of v6.0.24

[ranocha]

That would be great, thanks!

[ranocha]

Thanks!