Skip to content

Conversation

@eksly
Copy link
Contributor

@eksly eksly commented Oct 24, 2025

Challenge 2 Solution

Submitted by: @eksly
Challenge: Challenge 2

Description

This PR contains my solution for Challenge 2.

Changes

  • Added solution file to challenge-2/submissions/eksly/solution-template.go

Testing

  • Solution passes all test cases
  • Code follows Go best practices

Thank you for reviewing my submission! 🚀

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a new Go file implementing a simple CLI utility that reads a string from standard input, reverses it using rune-wise iteration, and prints the result. Includes an exported ReverseString function and minimal error handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New Challenge-2 Submission
challenge-2/submissions/eksly/solution-template.go
Adds main function for CLI input/output and exported ReverseString(s string) string function implementing rune-wise string reversal using standard library packages (bufio, fmt, os).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "Add solution for Challenge 2 by eksly" clearly and concisely describes the main change in the pull request. It is fully related to the changeset, specifically identifying that a solution file for Challenge 2 is being added by the contributor eksly. The title is specific enough that a teammate scanning PR history would immediately understand the primary change without ambiguity.
Description Check ✅ Passed The pull request description is directly related to the changeset and provides relevant context about the submission. It clearly identifies the challenge number, the contributor, specifies the exact file path being added, and includes testing status information. The description is neither vague nor off-topic, providing sufficient detail about what is being changed and why.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
challenge-2/submissions/eksly/solution-template.go (1)

24-33: Consider pre-allocating the result slice for better performance.

The current implementation appends to the slice in a loop, which may cause multiple allocations as the slice grows. Since you know the final size upfront, pre-allocating the slice and assigning directly would be more efficient.

Here's an optimized version:

 // ReverseString returns the reversed string of s.
 func ReverseString(s string) string {
-    var res []rune
     runes := []rune(s)
+    res := make([]rune, len(runes))
 	
 	for i := len(runes) -1; i >= 0; i-- {
-	    res = append(res, runes[i])
+	    res[len(runes)-1-i] = runes[i]
 	}
 	
 	return string(res)
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebd0bb3 and 1432849.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • challenge-2/submissions/eksly/solution-template.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
challenge-2/submissions/eksly/solution-template.go (1)

1-7: LGTM!

Package declaration and imports are correct. All standard library imports are necessary for the functionality.

Comment on lines +9 to +21
func main() {
// Read input from standard input
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
if scanner.Scan() {
input := scanner.Text()

// Call the ReverseString function
output := ReverseString(input)

// Print the result
fmt.Println(output)
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Add error handling for scanner.

After scanning input, you should check for errors using scanner.Err(). Currently, if an I/O error occurs during scanning, it will be silently ignored.

Consider this improvement:

 func main() {
 	// Read input from standard input
 	scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
 	if scanner.Scan() {
 		input := scanner.Text()
 
 		// Call the ReverseString function
 		output := ReverseString(input)
 
 		// Print the result
 		fmt.Println(output)
 	}
+	if err := scanner.Err(); err != nil {
+		fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Error reading input: %v\n", err)
+		os.Exit(1)
+	}
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
func main() {
// Read input from standard input
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
if scanner.Scan() {
input := scanner.Text()
// Call the ReverseString function
output := ReverseString(input)
// Print the result
fmt.Println(output)
}
}
func main() {
// Read input from standard input
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
if scanner.Scan() {
input := scanner.Text()
// Call the ReverseString function
output := ReverseString(input)
// Print the result
fmt.Println(output)
}
if err := scanner.Err(); err != nil {
fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Error reading input: %v\n", err)
os.Exit(1)
}
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In challenge-2/submissions/eksly/solution-template.go around lines 9 to 21, the
code ignores potential scanning errors — after using scanner.Scan() you must
call scanner.Err() to detect I/O errors; modify the main function to check
scanner.Err() after scanning and handle any non-nil error (e.g., print an error
to stderr and os.Exit(1) or return) so I/O failures are not silently ignored.

@RezaSi RezaSi merged commit 3835338 into RezaSi:main Oct 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants