-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat(provider): implement unleash provider #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kikihakiem, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a new OpenFeature provider for Unleash, a popular feature management platform. This implementation allows Python applications to seamlessly integrate with Unleash for managing feature flags and tracking user interactions. The provider handles initialization, flag evaluation for various data types, event propagation, and conversion of OpenFeature contexts to Unleash-compatible formats. It aims to provide a robust and well-tested solution for feature flagging within the OpenFeature ecosystem.
Highlights
- New Unleash Provider Implementation: This PR introduces a new OpenFeature provider specifically designed for Unleash, enabling seamless integration of feature flag management into Python applications. It includes the core
UnleashProviderclass, responsible for initializing the Unleash client and managing its lifecycle. - Robust Flag Evaluation Capabilities: The provider now supports comprehensive flag evaluation for all OpenFeature types: boolean, string, integer, float, and object. It leverages Unleash's
is_enabledfor boolean flags andget_variantfor other types, ensuring accurate resolution based on configured strategies and contexts. - Enhanced Event Management: Event handling has been integrated, allowing the provider to emit OpenFeature
PROVIDER_READY,PROVIDER_ERROR, andPROVIDER_CONFIGURATION_CHANGEDevents. This ensures that applications can react to changes in the provider's state and flag configurations. - Integrated Tracking Support: The provider now includes support for OpenFeature's
trackfunctionality, converting application-level tracking events and evaluation contexts into Unleash impression events. This enables A/B testing and analytics within the Unleash platform. - Extensive Testing and Validation: Comprehensive test coverage has been added, including unit tests for individual components (events, flag evaluation, provider core) and integration tests. The integration tests utilize
testcontainersto spin up a real Unleash server and PostgreSQL database, ensuring end-to-end functionality verification.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new Unleash provider for OpenFeature, which is a great addition. The implementation is well-structured with a clear separation of concerns for event handling, flag evaluation, and tracking. The inclusion of comprehensive unit and integration tests using testcontainers is excellent and ensures the provider's reliability. I've provided a few suggestions to improve documentation clarity, enhance error handling, and correct some logic in the flag evaluation process. Overall, this is a solid contribution.
providers/openfeature-provider-unleash/src/openfeature/contrib/provider/unleash/events.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ers/openfeature-provider-unleash/src/openfeature/contrib/provider/unleash/flag_evaluation.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ers/openfeature-provider-unleash/src/openfeature/contrib/provider/unleash/flag_evaluation.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cc7ef97 to
b5c754d
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
…eger_details, resolve_float_details and resolve_object_details Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
d5f7e81 to
9a579d6
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
01b3e09 to
048029b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
1931868 to
7e02cb3
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kiki L Hakiem <[email protected]>
7e02cb3 to
4133039
Compare
No description provided.