Skip to content

[AUTOGENERATED] [release/2.6] skip 3D NCHW FP16 batchnorm test due to Native accuracy issue #2391

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

okakarpa
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry-pick of #2370

…tive accuracy issue (#2370)

Skip for
`test_nn.py::TestNN.test_batchnorm_3D_train_NCHW_vs_native_mixed_float16`
Test failed on `weight gradient` comparison MIOpen/CuDNN vs Native
batchnorm.

But CPU test `test_batchnorm_3D_train_NCHW_vs_cpu_mixed_float16` passed.
It looks like FP16 Native batchnorm issue.

Failed on MI200/MI300 and V100
It passed somehow on Navi (with enabled MIOpen)

Fixes SWDEV-541024, SWDEV-539171

```
python test_nn.py -v -k test_batchnorm_3D_train_NCHW_vs_native_mixed_float16

test_batchnorm_3D_train_NCHW_vs_native_mixed_float16 (__main__.TestNN) ... skipped '3D float16 NCHW train failed on CUDA and ROCm due to Native batchnorm accuracy issue SWDEV-541024'

OK (skipped=1)
```
@rocm-repo-management-api
Copy link

rocm-repo-management-api bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Jenkins build for 22c1f466593a1f288c9877e74f44e3eb3e1031fc commit finished as FAILURE
Links: Blue Ocean view / Build artifacts

@dnikolaev-amd dnikolaev-amd marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2025 21:06
@jithunnair-amd jithunnair-amd changed the title [AUTOGENERATED] [release/2.6] [rocm7.0_internal_testing] skip 3D NCHW FP16 batchnorm test due to Native accuracy issue [AUTOGENERATED] [release/2.6] skip 3D NCHW FP16 batchnorm test due to Native accuracy issue Jul 24, 2025
@jithunnair-amd jithunnair-amd merged commit 9663f2d into release/2.6 Jul 24, 2025
2 of 6 checks passed
@jithunnair-amd jithunnair-amd deleted the autogenerated/release/2.6_cherry-pick_pr-2370 branch July 24, 2025 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants