-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
Rsyntax #1560
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rsyntax #1560
Conversation
Bumps [actions/download-artifact](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact) from 3 to 4.1.7. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/download-artifact/releases) - [Commits](actions/download-artifact@v3...v4.1.7) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/download-artifact dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
To be more consistant with other languages such as python
0.1.7 doesn't pass npm pretest
|
@renkun-ken |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM Thanks!
Of course... done |
|
I think this breaks variable highlighting when using "<-" |
|
Can you elaborate? The change is supposed to bring more consistency with other languages such as python. |
|
The assignment operator in R can be |
|
Hi, the coloring for var1 indeed was the correct and intended. It is consistent with how python and other languages handle variables. However, it does seem that the |
|
Python and other languages handle variables differently. The light blue represents variables in all my python scripts, which is why I thought there was an unintended issue here. Can there be an option to customize syntax highlighting as users wish? |
|
I am pushing some more updates in #1605. Below are my highlights for python and R. Can you put your cursor in your python |




Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.