-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 399
Add warnings about read-only automatic variables introduced in PowerShell 6.0 #917
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
JamesWTruher
merged 9 commits into
PowerShell:development
from
bergmeister:WarnReadOnlyVarPsCore
Apr 9, 2018
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eb73985
Add warnings about readonly variables introduced in PowerShell 6.0
bergmeister 178711c
use custom message for variables that only apply to ps 6.0
bergmeister c55f39c
Remove redundant quotes in IT block because Pester adds them now auto…
bergmeister 5fda73d
Make it throw an Error when PSSA is executed on PSCore
bergmeister bbc8f3d
address pr comments
bergmeister abd4f61
Merge branch 'development' of https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptA…
bergmeister d81a5a8
exclude PSUseDeclaredVarsMoreThanAssignments rule for tests
bergmeister a5c023a
Merge branch 'development' of https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptA…
bergmeister ad56c52
Merge branch 'development' of https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptA…
bergmeister File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see the above pattern a lot, but it worries me. I would think that the
Where-Object
clause would obfuscate additional unexpected errors. Shouldn't we know the total amount of errors we expect and not have to filter for only what we expect?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no 'right' answer, I think. There is the approach of having either isolated unit tests (with the benefit of lower maintenance) or doing integration testing as part of the test. We are still running all rules against it, so we would probably still get a test failure if one rule unexpectedly threw an exception but we would not have to adapt tests too much if rules changed. I will leave this decision up to you and will therefore remove the
Where-Object
and replace it with$warnings.RuleName | Should -Be $ruleName'. In one test case I will use
-ExcludeRule PSUseDeclaredVarsMoreThanAssignments`