New Components - opsgenie #15462
New Components - opsgenie #15462
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request enhances the Opsgenie component by introducing two new actions: adding a note to an existing alert and deleting an alert. The changes include creating new modules for these actions, updating the Opsgenie app file with corresponding methods, and adding a default limit constant. The package version has been incremented to reflect these additions, expanding the component's capabilities for alert management. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
components/opsgenie/opsgenie.app.mjs (2)
8-27: Anticipate potential error scenarios in thealertIdoptions method.
While the approach for fetching and mapping alerts is sound, consider adding error handling to cover cases wherelistAlertscould fail or return unexpected data.You might, for instance, catch exceptions and return a fallback array or an error message.
+ try { + const { data } = await this.listAlerts({ ... }); + return data?.map(...) || []; + } catch (err) { + console.error("Failed to fetch alerts", err); + return []; + }
137-146: Handle possible 404 or validation errors indeleteAlert.
While this action typically succeeds, consider returning a more descriptive response if the alert is non-existent or already deleted.components/opsgenie/actions/delete-alert/delete-alert.mjs (1)
1-26: Consider robust error handling for missing or invalid alerts.
In some cases, Opsgenie might respond with a 404 or 400 if the alert ID is invalid. Including a try/catch or validations can improve user feedback.Example (illustrative only):
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.opsgenie.deleteAlert({ $, alertId: this.alertId, }); + if (!response) { + $.export("$summary", "No response received from Opsgenie."); + return; + } $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted alert with ID: ${this.alertId}`); return response; } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to delete alert: ${error.message}`); } }components/opsgenie/actions/add-note-alert/add-note-alert.mjs (1)
1-34: Include error handling for note addition.
An invalid or missing alert ID could produce unexpected errors in Opsgenie’s response. Consider catching those for improved UX.async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.opsgenie.addNoteToAlert({ $, alertId: this.alertId, data: { note: this.note }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully added note to alert with ID: ${this.alertId}`); return response; } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to add note: ${error.message}`); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/opsgenie/actions/add-note-alert/add-note-alert.mjs(1 hunks)components/opsgenie/actions/delete-alert/delete-alert.mjs(1 hunks)components/opsgenie/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/opsgenie/opsgenie.app.mjs(5 hunks)components/opsgenie/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- components/opsgenie/common/constants.mjs
- components/opsgenie/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/opsgenie/opsgenie.app.mjs (7)
45-45: Naming consistency looks good.
Labeling the property as"Message"remains consistent with other descriptive labels in this file.
89-89: URL handling is correct.
Constructing the URL withthis._baseUrl()and appendingpathproperly yields valid endpoint paths.
96-102: List alerts implementation is straightforward.
This method concisely forwards parameters to_makeRequestand uses the team API key correctly.
Line range hint
111-119: Ensure noawaitcalls remain insidegetAlertStatus.
The removal ofasyncis fine as this method simply returns the promise.
120-126: Consistent approach inlistUsers.
Similar togetAlertStatus, verify noawaitusage is left. This looks clean.
127-136:addNoteToAlertmethod is well-structured.
Adding notes via a POST request is consistent with Opsgenie’s documentation.
Line range hint
79-88: Confirm that removingasyncdoesn't break any callers.
This method still returns a Promise, but ensure that all call sites that previously depended onawaitremain functional.Please run the following script to confirm no callers rely on the old
asyncsignature:✅ Verification successful
Removing
asyncis safe as the method remains Promise-basedThe change is safe because:
- The method returns an axios call which is already Promise-based
- All callers in the opsgenie component use direct returns rather than await
- The Promise chain is preserved without the unnecessary async wrapper
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash rg -A 3 'await this\._makeRequest'Length of output: 66146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any callers within the opsgenie component rg -A 3 'await this\._makeRequest' components/opsgenie/Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of _makeRequest in opsgenie component rg -A 5 '_makeRequest' components/opsgenie/Length of output: 2619
jcortes
left a comment
jcortes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!
Resolves #11627
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Opsgenie Integration
New Features
Improvements
Version Updates