Feature Request: State Management

[CharlieGreenman]

• I'm submitting a ...
  [ ] bug report
  [X] feature request
  [ ] question about the decisions made in the repository
• Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
  Feature
• What is the current behavior?
  App does not currently allow for state management out of the box.
• What is the expected behavior?
  Build system should have the ability to manage state, using either ngrx, or ng2-redux.
• What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
  Ability to manage state using ngrx, or ng2-redux. (Ideally, ngrx.)
• Please tell us about your environment:
• Angular version: 2.0.0-beta.X
• Browser: all

[joshwiens]

@CharlieGreenman - This would be something that belongs on a fork of the angular2-webpack-starter. My suggestion would be to go the route that NathanWalker went with https://github.com/NathanWalker/angular-seed-advanced

Not everyone wants / needs something like ngrx.

As an aside, professionally I run a heavily modified version of the webpack-starter with ngrx / scss & a few other goodies. If you were interested in maintaining a feature fork for ngrx, i'd certainly be up for contributing to it.

[CharlieGreenman]

Ok. I was thinking of contributing to https://github.com/qdouble/angular-webpack2-starter. However, https://github.com/NathanWalker/angular-seed-advanced does seem to be better off for this stage in things. It's just that angular2-seed-advanced is too jammed pack, with Electron/Nativescript in particular. I'll take my reservations over to angular2-seed-advanced if need be.

[joshwiens]

@CharlieGreenman I wasn't necessarily suggesting you contribute to a different repo.

To be clear, I was suggesting you create a fork of this repo and modify it to run ngrx as an example / base seed for those that want to get into redux.

Nathan's advanced seed is great but it's based on SystemJS, if you want to use Webpack ( my personal choice ) that is going to be a big change. I've looked at the angular-webpack2-starter it's solid work but imho it's a bit cluttered for my taste.

In the end I personally forked this repo & added ngrx, scss & material2 and it's maintained independently at this point.

[CharlieGreenman]

Hey @d3viant0ne , I actually did realize that! I also realized after writing what
I should mention it, but was caught up at the time :)

That being said, would you be interested in open sourcing the your personal repo that has ngrx and scss. I would be more than interested in maintaining. Regardless, I am going to go ahead and create a ngrx/scss version of this repo. Thank you.

On Oct 27, 2016 1:16 AM, "Joshua Wiens" notifications@github.com wrote:

@CharlieGreenman https://github.com/CharlieGreenman I wasn't
necessarily suggesting you contribute to a different repo.

To be clear, I was suggesting you create a fork of this repo and modify it
to run ngrx as an example / base seed for those that want to get into redux.

Nathan's advanced seed is great but it's based on SystemJS, if you want to
use Webpack ( my personal choice ) that is going to be a big change. I've
looked at the angular-webpack2-starter it's solid work but imho it's a
bit cluttered for my taste.

In the end I personally forked this repo & added ngrx, scss & material2
and it's maintained independently at this point.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1121 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIJP7RAUNlpJ4JA559DVTlsnQMJs3HIkks5q4DOrgaJpZM4KeB-8
.