-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: update readme files in repository #27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@ramraut-osm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe project underwent a transformation from Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/README.md (1)
1-1
: Ensure the project title is consistent across all documentation.Consider verifying that the project title "Transcript Summarizer" is consistently used in all related documentation and files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (4)
README.md (4)
Near line 27: Unpaired symbol: ‘[’ seems to be missing
Context: ...of the following two components: 1. api, the backend of the applicati...
Near line 28: Unpaired symbol: ‘[’ seems to be missing
Context: ...he backend of the application 2. portal, the frontend of the appli...
Near line 30: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... the frontend of the application Refer the corresponding README files of these com...
Near line 52: The wording of this phrase can be improved.
Context: ...nd effort put in by all contributors to make this project better!
Additional comments not posted (7)
README.md (7)
1-3
: The project title and welcome message updates are clear and concise.
5-5
: The updated project description provides a clear and concise overview of the tool's functionality.
7-10
: The "What It Does" section effectively explains the purpose and benefits of the tool.
11-15
: The "Why Choose Us?" section clearly outlines the advantages of using the tool.
17-23
: The "Key Features" section provides a clear and concise list of the tool's main features.
32-40
: The "Contributing" section provides clear guidelines for contributions.
42-44
: The "License" section provides clear licensing information.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (3)
README.md (3)
Near line 28: Unpaired symbol: ‘[’ seems to be missing
Context: ...f the following two components: 1. api: the backend of the applicati...
Near line 29: Unpaired symbol: ‘[’ seems to be missing
Context: ...he backend of the application 2. portal: the frontend of the appli...
Near line 53: The wording of this phrase can be improved.
Context: ...nd effort put in by all contributors to make this project better!
Additional comments not posted (4)
README.md (4)
1-6
: The project title and description updates are clear and well-written.
7-10
: The "What It Does" section is concise and informative.
11-16
: The "Why Choose Us?" section is well-organized and clearly states the benefits.
17-23
: The "Key Features" section is well-presented and clearly lists the features.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
API PR Checklist
Pre-requisites
PR Details
PR details have been updated as per the given format (see below)
feat: add admin login endpoint
)Additional Information
ready for review
should be added if the PR is ready to be reviewed)Description:
Updated the readme files in the repository.
Related changes:
Screenshots:
Add any screenshots as required.
Query request and response:
Documentation changes:
Test suite output:
Pending actions:
Additional notes:
Summary by CodeRabbit