feat: change migration table name #20
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@ramraut-osm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent modifications involve refining the database schema for a job tracking system. The changes include updating the migration table name for clarity and removing unnecessary foreign key constraints related to job files. These adjustments aim to simplify the database structure and enhance its manageability. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Remove unused import 'TableForeignKey'.- import { MigrationInterface, QueryRunner, Table, TableForeignKey, } from "typeorm"; + import { MigrationInterface, QueryRunner, Table } from "typeorm";
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/api/src/config/typeorm/configuration.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/api/src/config/typeorm/configuration.ts
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
lint failure (3)
apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts: [failure] 1-1:
'TableForeignKey' is defined but never used
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts (2)
Line range hint
7-25: Ensure the table creation in theupmethod aligns with the new database schema requirements.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that the only occurrence of the
new Tablelogic related to the 'jobs' table is in the migration file1714646233635-migration.ts. This aligns with the initial review comment, which focused on ensuring that the table creation in theupmethod aligns with the new database schema requirements.Since the script output indicates that this is the only place where the 'jobs' table is defined, and no other instances were found in the codebase, it suggests that the table creation is likely aligned with the new schema requirements as no conflicting or additional definitions were found.
Final Response:
The verification confirms that the table creation for 'jobs' in the
upmethod of the migration file aligns with the new database schema requirements, as no other conflicting table definitions were found in the codebase.
- File:
apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts- Specific location: Table creation logic within the
upmethod.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the table 'jobs' aligns with the new schema requirements. # Test: Search for the table creation logic in the codebase. Expect: Alignment with the new schema. rg --type typescript $'new Table({ name: \'jobs\''Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the table 'jobs' aligns with the new schema requirements. # Test: Search for the table creation logic in the codebase. Expect: Alignment with the new schema. rg --type typescript "new Table({ name: 'jobs'"Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the table 'jobs' aligns with the new schema requirements. # Test: Search for the table creation logic in the codebase. Expect: Alignment with the new schema. rg --type typescript "new Table"Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the table 'jobs' aligns with the new schema requirements. # Test: Search for the table creation logic in the codebase. Expect: Alignment with the new schema. rg "new Table"Length of output: 100
Line range hint
27-29: Confirm that dropping the 'jobs' table in thedownmethod is intended and aligns with the overall migration strategy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/api/src/database/migrations/1714646233635-migration.ts
2 participants
API PR Checklist
Pre-requisites
PR Details
PR details have been updated as per the given format (see below)
feat: add admin login endpoint)Additional Information
ready for reviewshould be added if the PR is ready to be reviewed)Description:
Updated migration table name in typeORM config file
Related changes:
Screenshots:
Add any screenshots as required.
Query request and response:
Documentation changes:
Test suite output:
Pending actions:
Additional notes:
Summary by CodeRabbit