Skip to content

Conversation

@bvanjeelharia
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

hbrunn and others added 30 commits March 13, 2023 11:47
When no background configuration is present on the report definition,
don't try to browse the report model especially because this breaks
some upstream reports (see odoo/odoo#23389)
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: reporting-engine-11.0/reporting-engine-11.0-report_qweb_pdf_watermark
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/reporting-engine-11-0/reporting-engine-11-0-report_qweb_pdf_watermark/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: reporting-engine-12.0/reporting-engine-12.0-report_qweb_pdf_watermark
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/reporting-engine-12-0/reporting-engine-12-0-report_qweb_pdf_watermark/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: reporting-engine-12.0/reporting-engine-12.0-report_qweb_pdf_watermark
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/reporting-engine-12-0/reporting-engine-12-0-report_qweb_pdf_watermark/
[MIG] report_qweb_pdf_watermark: Migration to 15.0
@bvanjeelharia bvanjeelharia force-pushed the 16.0-mig-report_qweb_pdf_watermark branch from 1859af7 to fe281ec Compare March 13, 2023 14:30
Copy link

@CasVissers-360ERP CasVissers-360ERP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review

@chrisb-c01
Copy link
Contributor

Can we get this merged?

Copy link

@antoniocanovas antoniocanovas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review OK

Copy link

@ConesaJM ConesaJM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional Review Good

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@Jan-Onestein
Copy link

@OCA/reporting-engine-maintainers

Can we please have this merged ?? :)

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza changed the title [MIG] report_qweb_pdf_watermark: Migration to 16.0 [16.0][MIG] report_qweb_pdf_watermark: Migration to 16.0 Apr 4, 2023
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge nobump
/ocabot migration report_qweb_pdf_watermark

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 16.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2023
15 tasks
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-734-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 80c2bb5 into OCA:16.0 Apr 4, 2023
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 0cb330b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.