-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 379
[16.0][MIG] document_page_partner #465
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] document_page_partner #465
Conversation
|
Pretty straightforward - it's just the adding of 1 field. Why still draft? And there's 1 pre-commit issue |
1fe4abb to
e39c0a3
Compare
|
@ntsirintanis Somehow the commits seem a bit strange - the pre-commit commit removes all the files, whereas the migration commit adds them all again under a new module name. It would be better if perhaps there's a separate "rename" commit, which renames the module, after which the pre-commit is run. Or, the renaming can be included in the migration to 16.0. |
flotho
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks
Expected behaviour
e39c0a3 to
0b6fd9e
Compare
|
@ntsirintanis Still, I don't understand the commit structure.
I understand how this came to be, because you based yourself on #314, who made the original choice of not renaming but copying. But in this way you lose commit history and you can't If you're going to do it in this way, you might as well remove the commits related to |
|
This PR has the |
|
/ocabot migration document_page_partner |
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
|
@HaraldPanten The merge process could not be finalized, because command |
Renamed
document_page_partner_idtodocument_page_partnerand ported it from 10 to 16, with intermediate MR #314