doc: add example usage for gitea in tarball fetcher #11116
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RTUnreal
force-pushed
the
add_gitea_reference
branch
from
fa2be20 to
cdacc13
Compare
fricklerhandwerk
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2024
Contributor
|
Thanks @RTUnreal! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Since both Gitea and Forgejo now support the
rel="immutable"Link headers, it should be documented how one would use it in a flake.Context
Forgejo PR: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3615
Gitea PR: go-gitea/gitea#31139
Priorities and Process
Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.
The Nix maintainer team uses a GitHub project board to schedule and track reviews.