RISC-V Relocation Types Missing from PE Format Definition #2075
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@JasonBrave : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
|
@Karl-Bridge-Microsoft @alvinashcraft @stevewhims |
JasonBrave
force-pushed
the
pe-format-riscv
branch
from
9e886ca to
5dee781
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I'm currently implement RISC-V PE/COFF format support in LLVM llvm/llvm-project#148045 for compiling UEFI Applications. I wonder if there are COFF Relocation type definition for RISC-V processors? If not could those definitions be added. Thanks.
@Karl-Bridge-Microsoft @makubacki @RussKeldorph @htpiv