Skip to content

Conversation

@MichaelDoyle
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@MichaelDoyle MichaelDoyle self-assigned this Oct 16, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @MichaelDoyle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a structural refactor to the ngx-json-treeview library, aiming to enhance code organization and maintainability. It involves grouping component-related files into a dedicated directory and separating common type definitions into their own file. This change improves modularity and clarifies the project structure, making it easier to navigate and manage the codebase.

Highlights

  • Component File Grouping: The core files for the ngx-json-treeview component (HTML, SCSS, spec, and TypeScript) have been moved into a dedicated subdirectory named ngx-json-treeview for better organization.
  • Type Separation: The Segment interface and IsClickableValueFn type definition have been extracted from the ngx-json-treeview.component.ts file into a new, separate types.ts file, centralizing type declarations.
  • Public API Update: The public-api.ts file has been updated to reflect the new location of the ngx-json-treeview component and to export the newly created types.ts file, ensuring these types are accessible to consumers of the library.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the project structure by grouping component-related files into a dedicated directory and extracting type definitions into a separate types.ts file. These changes improve code organization and maintainability. The file moves and import path updates are correct. I've added one suggestion to improve type safety by replacing any with unknown in the newly created types.ts file.

@MichaelDoyle MichaelDoyle merged commit b7e4612 into main Oct 16, 2025
1 check passed
@MichaelDoyle MichaelDoyle deleted the restructure-component branch October 16, 2025 02:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants