-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Option 4 - Fixed - Culture Dependent Date Format Test Failures #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
Fixes test failures that occur when running tests on systems with non-US locales by making date formatting culture-aware instead of using hardcoded US date formats or invariant culture expectations.
- Updated unit tests to expect
CultureInfo.CurrentCultureformatting instead ofCultureInfo.InvariantCulture - Replaced hardcoded date strings in integration tests with dynamic culture-aware formatting
- Added date separator replacement logic to handle culture-specific separators (e.g., hyphens vs slashes)
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| DateTagHelperFixture.cs | Changed unit test expectations from InvariantCulture to CurrentCulture |
| RichTextFieldTagHelperFixture.cs | Added culture-aware date separator replacement for hardcoded date string |
| DateFieldTagHelperFixture.cs | Replaced hardcoded date strings with dynamic formatting using TestConstants |
| AllFieldTagHelpersFixture.cs | Updated date field assertion to use dynamic formatting instead of hardcoded constant |
| ViewFieldsBindingFixture.cs | Added culture-aware date separator replacement for hardcoded date string |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| .Should().Be(TestConstants.AllFieldsImageValue); | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes.First(n => n.Name.Equals("div", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) && n.Id.Equals("div6", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)).InnerHtml | ||
| .Should().Be(TestConstants.DateFieldValue); | ||
| .Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); |
Copilot
AI
Aug 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hardcoded format string "MM/dd/yyyy" contradicts the culture-aware approach. Consider using a culture-neutral format or the culture's standard short date pattern via CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.DateTimeFormat.ShortDatePattern.
| .Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); | |
| .Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.DateTimeFormat.ShortDatePattern, CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested this change and it causes the test to fail because the actual component output uses a hardcoded "MM/dd/yyyy" format (producing "05/04/2012"), while ShortDatePattern produces "5/4/2012" without leading zeros.
| // Assert | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[1].InnerHtml.Should().Be("05/04/2012"); | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[3].InnerHtml.Should().Be("05/04/2012 00:00:00"); | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[1].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); |
Copilot
AI
Aug 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using hardcoded format "MM/dd/yyyy" with CurrentCulture may still produce incorrect results in non-US locales. Some cultures don't use MM/dd/yyyy format even when explicitly specified. Consider using the culture's native short date pattern.
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[1].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); | |
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[1].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.DateTimeFormat.ShortDatePattern, CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same, I tested this change and it causes the test to fail because the actual component output uses a hardcoded "MM/dd/yyyy" format (producing "05/04/2012"), while ShortDatePattern produces "5/4/2012" without leading zeros.
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[1].InnerHtml.Should().Be("05/04/2012"); | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[3].InnerHtml.Should().Be("05/04/2012 00:00:00"); | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[1].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); | ||
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[3].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); |
Copilot
AI
Aug 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hardcoded format "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss" with CurrentCulture may still fail in cultures that use different date/time patterns. Consider using culture-appropriate format patterns or a more flexible matching approach.
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[3].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)); | |
| sectionNode.ChildNodes[3].InnerHtml.Should().Be(TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should go with the CultureInfo.CurrentCulture because it expect the date format regarding that specific culture
…tions - DateTime.Parse
Fix Culture-Dependent Date Format Test Failures
Description
This PR fixes test failures that occur when running the test suite on systems with non-US locales (e.g., Danish culture
da-DK). The issue was caused by hardcoded date format expectations in tests that didn't account for culture-specific date formatting differences.Problem
When the system culture was set to Danish (
da-DK), several date-related tests failed because:-) as date separators instead of slashes (/)"05/04/2012") but got culture-specific formats (e.g.,"05-04-2012")CultureInfo.InvariantCulturefor expectations while the actual implementation usedCultureInfo.CurrentCultureRoot Cause
The
DateTagHelperimplementation correctly usesCultureInfo.CurrentCulturewhen no specific culture is provided:However, tests were expecting either:
Changes Made
Unit Tests (
DateTagHelperFixture.cs)Changed test expectations from
CultureInfo.InvariantCulturetoCultureInfo.CurrentCultureto match the actual implementation behaviorIntegration Tests
Replaced hardcoded date strings with dynamic culture-aware formatting using
TestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString()with appropriate format strings andCultureInfo.CurrentCultureAllFieldTagHelpersFixture.cs- Changed from hardcodedTestConstants.DateFieldValueto dynamic formatting usingTestConstants.DateTimeValue.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture)ViewFieldsBindingFixture.cs- Added culture-aware date separator replacement:"12/12/2019".Replace("/", CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.DateTimeFormat.DateSeparator)RichTextFieldTagHelperFixture.cs- Applied the same date separator fix as ViewFieldsBindingFixture.cs