Test Static 0.7

[ChrisRackauckas]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #300 (19bfb47) into master (b922313) will decrease coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 96.42%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #300      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.74%   91.47%   -0.27%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1429     1420       -9     
==========================================
- Hits         1311     1299      -12     
- Misses        118      121       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/stridelayout.jl	90.53% <88.88%> (ø)
src/axes.jl	92.76% <100.00%> (-0.66%)	⬇️
src/dimensions.jl	96.49% <100.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
src/indexing.jl	88.98% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ranges.jl	92.46% <100.00%> (-1.01%)	⬇️
src/size.jl	92.13% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b922313...19bfb47. Read the comment docs.

[Tokazama]

I dropped the == method for Symbol and StaticSymbol because it causes a bunch of invalidations. There's a PR in base to fix that but it hasn't had any movement lately. It would probably be easier for me to just change the tests here.

[Tokazama]

I've fixed the dimension tests. There are still problems with to_shape but I should probably sit down and investigate potential invalidations before defining something there.

[Tokazama]

Now that this is working we can get a good feel for the improvement on load time.

• master: 0.099550 seconds (127.35 k allocations: 7.828 MiB, 6.37% compilation time)

• PR: 0.050113 seconds (83.22 k allocations: 5.470 MiB, 10.80% compilation time)

EDIT: This should be even better on Julia nightly because we still have 25 invalidations on v1.8 and some of those have been fixed since.

[Tokazama]

@chriselrod, what needs to happen downstream for this to work for the JuliaSIMD packages? I'll be available throughout the day to periodically submit PRs if necessary.

[chriselrod]

@chriselrod, what needs to happen downstream for this to work for the JuliaSIMD packages? I'll be available throughout the day to periodically submit PRs if necessary.

ArrayInterface needs to accept 0.7 before they can accept 0.7.
I think the easiest way to test ArrayInterface + package that depends on Static.jl is to dev them both locally.
Doing so on CI would be difficult, but you could probably create a branch for the other repo where you bump Static compat, and then set the downstream CI here to use that branch.

[chriselrod]

Can we merge this and release?

If we need additional changes, we can make another release, and the dependent packages can set that ArrayInterface version as their lower bound.

[Tokazama]

I guess we need to rip off the band-aid eventually...