Components test #9

HyukjinKwon · 2020-07-13T08:23:55Z

Test

…ub Actions ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR mainly proposes to run only relevant tests just like Jenkins PR builder does. Currently, GitHub Actions always run full tests which wastes the resources. In addition, this PR also fixes 3 more issues very closely related together while I am here. 1. The main idea here is: It reuses the existing logic embedded in `dev/run-tests.py` which Jenkins PR builder use in order to run only the related test cases. 2. While I am here, I fixed SPARK-32292 too to run the doc tests. It was because other references were not available when it is cloned via `checkoutv2`. With `fetch-depth: 0`, the history is available. 3. In addition, it fixes the `dev/run-tests.py` to match with `python/run-tests.py` in terms of its options. Environment variables such as `TEST_ONLY_XXX` were moved as proper options. For example, ```bash dev/run-tests.py --modules sql,core ``` which is consistent with `python/run-tests.py`, for example, ```bash python/run-tests.py --modules pyspark-core,pyspark-ml ``` 4. Lastly, also fixed the formatting issue in module specification in the matrix: ```diff - network_common, network_shuffle, repl, launcher + network-common, network-shuffle, repl, launcher, ``` which incorrectly runs build/test the modules. ### Why are the changes needed? By running only related tests, we can hugely save the resources and avoid unrelated flaky tests, etc. Also, now it runs the doctest of `dev/run-tests.py` properly, the usages are similar between `dev/run-tests.py` and `python/run-tests.py`, and run `network-common`, `network-shuffle`, `launcher` and `examples` modules too. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? Manually tested in my own forked Spark: HyukjinKwon#7 HyukjinKwon#8 HyukjinKwon#9 HyukjinKwon#10 HyukjinKwon#11 HyukjinKwon#12 Closes #29086 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32292. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

…ub Actions This PR mainly proposes to run only relevant tests just like Jenkins PR builder does. Currently, GitHub Actions always run full tests which wastes the resources. In addition, this PR also fixes 3 more issues very closely related together while I am here. 1. The main idea here is: It reuses the existing logic embedded in `dev/run-tests.py` which Jenkins PR builder use in order to run only the related test cases. 2. While I am here, I fixed SPARK-32292 too to run the doc tests. It was because other references were not available when it is cloned via `checkoutv2`. With `fetch-depth: 0`, the history is available. 3. In addition, it fixes the `dev/run-tests.py` to match with `python/run-tests.py` in terms of its options. Environment variables such as `TEST_ONLY_XXX` were moved as proper options. For example, ```bash dev/run-tests.py --modules sql,core ``` which is consistent with `python/run-tests.py`, for example, ```bash python/run-tests.py --modules pyspark-core,pyspark-ml ``` 4. Lastly, also fixed the formatting issue in module specification in the matrix: ```diff - network_common, network_shuffle, repl, launcher + network-common, network-shuffle, repl, launcher, ``` which incorrectly runs build/test the modules. By running only related tests, we can hugely save the resources and avoid unrelated flaky tests, etc. Also, now it runs the doctest of `dev/run-tests.py` properly, the usages are similar between `dev/run-tests.py` and `python/run-tests.py`, and run `network-common`, `network-shuffle`, `launcher` and `examples` modules too. No, dev-only. Manually tested in my own forked Spark: #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Closes apache#29086 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32292. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

…n properly ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make `ResolveRelations` handle plan id properly ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix for Spark Connect, it won't affect classic Spark SQL before this PR: ``` from pyspark.sql import functions as sf spark.range(10).withColumn("value_1", sf.lit(1)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_1") spark.range(10).withColumnRenamed("id", "index").withColumn("value_2", sf.lit(2)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_2") df1 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") df2 = spark.read.table("test_table_2") df3 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") join1 = df1.join(df2, on=df1.id==df2.index).select(df2.index, df2.value_2) join2 = df3.join(join1, how="left", on=join1.index==df3.id) join2.schema ``` fails with ``` AnalysisException: [CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN] Cannot resolve dataframe column "id". It's probably because of illegal references like `df1.select(df2.col("a"))`. SQLSTATE: 42704 ``` That is due to existing plan caching in `ResolveRelations` doesn't work with Spark Connect ``` === Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations === '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) !:- '[#9]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 !+- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) +- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] ! :- '[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) ! +- '[#8]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_2], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 ! : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#8]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_2 ! +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_2`, [], false Can not resolve 'id with plan 7 ``` `[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false` was wrongly resolved to the cached one ``` :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? yes, bug fix ### How was this patch tested? added ut ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? ci Closes apache#45214 from zhengruifeng/connect_fix_read_join. Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

…plan properly ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make `ResolveRelations` handle plan id properly cherry-pick bugfix apache#45214 to 3.5 ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix for Spark Connect, it won't affect classic Spark SQL before this PR: ``` from pyspark.sql import functions as sf spark.range(10).withColumn("value_1", sf.lit(1)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_1") spark.range(10).withColumnRenamed("id", "index").withColumn("value_2", sf.lit(2)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_2") df1 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") df2 = spark.read.table("test_table_2") df3 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") join1 = df1.join(df2, on=df1.id==df2.index).select(df2.index, df2.value_2) join2 = df3.join(join1, how="left", on=join1.index==df3.id) join2.schema ``` fails with ``` AnalysisException: [CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN] Cannot resolve dataframe column "id". It's probably because of illegal references like `df1.select(df2.col("a"))`. SQLSTATE: 42704 ``` That is due to existing plan caching in `ResolveRelations` doesn't work with Spark Connect ``` === Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations === '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) !:- '[#9]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 !+- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) +- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] ! :- '[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) ! +- '[#8]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_2], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 ! : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#8]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_2 ! +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_2`, [], false Can not resolve 'id with plan 7 ``` `[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false` was wrongly resolved to the cached one ``` :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? yes, bug fix ### How was this patch tested? added ut ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? ci Closes apache#46291 from zhengruifeng/connect_fix_read_join_35. Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]>

### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to add `doCanonicalize` function for DataSourceV2ScanRelation. The implementation is similar to [the one in BatchScanExec](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/BatchScanExec.scala#L150), as well as the [the one in LogicalRelation](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/LogicalRelation.scala#L52). ### Why are the changes needed? Query optimization rules such as MergeScalarSubqueries check if two plans are identical by [comparing their canonicalized form](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/MergeScalarSubqueries.scala#L219). For DSv2, for physical plan, the canonicalization goes down in the child hierarchy to the BatchScanExec, which [has a doCanonicalize function](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/BatchScanExec.scala#L150); for logical plan, the canonicalization goes down to the DataSourceV2ScanRelation, which, however, does not have a doCanonicalize function. As a result, two logical plans who are semantically identical are not identified. Moreover, for reference, [DSv1 LogicalRelation](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/LogicalRelation.scala#L52) also has `doCanonicalize()`. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? A new unit test is added to show that `MergeScalarSubqueries` is working for DataSourceV2ScanRelation. For a query ```sql select (select max(i) from df) as max_i, (select min(i) from df) as min_i ``` Before introducing the canonicalization, the plan is ``` == Parsed Logical Plan == 'Project [scalar-subquery#2 [] AS max_i#3, scalar-subquery#4 [] AS min_i#5] : :- 'Project [unresolvedalias('max('i))] : : +- 'UnresolvedRelation [df], [], false : +- 'Project [unresolvedalias('min('i))] : +- 'UnresolvedRelation [df], [], false +- OneRowRelation == Analyzed Logical Plan == max_i: int, min_i: int Project [scalar-subquery#2 [] AS max_i#3, scalar-subquery#4 [] AS min_i#5] : :- Aggregate [max(i#0) AS max(i)#7] : : +- SubqueryAlias df : : +- View (`df`, [i#0, j#1]) : : +- RelationV2[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 : +- Aggregate [min(i#10) AS min(i)#9] : +- SubqueryAlias df : +- View (`df`, [i#10, j#11]) : +- RelationV2[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 +- OneRowRelation == Optimized Logical Plan == Project [scalar-subquery#2 [] AS max_i#3, scalar-subquery#4 [] AS min_i#5] : :- Aggregate [max(i#0) AS max(i)#7] : : +- Project [i#0] : : +- RelationV2[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 : +- Aggregate [min(i#10) AS min(i)#9] : +- Project [i#10] : +- RelationV2[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 +- OneRowRelation == Physical Plan == AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 0 +- *(1) Project [Subquery subquery#2, [id=#32] AS max_i#3, Subquery subquery#4, [id=#33] AS min_i#5] : :- Subquery subquery#2, [id=#32] : : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 1 +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7]) +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=58] +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0)], output=[max#14]) +- *(1) Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- == Initial Plan == HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7]) +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=19] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0)], output=[max#14]) +- Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] : +- Subquery subquery#4, [id=#33] : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 1 +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[min(i#10)], output=[min(i)#9]) +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=63] +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_min(i#10)], output=[min#15]) +- *(1) Project [i#10] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- == Initial Plan == HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[min(i#10)], output=[min(i)#9]) +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=30] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_min(i#10)], output=[min#15]) +- Project [i#10] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- *(1) Scan OneRowRelation[] +- == Initial Plan == Project [Subquery subquery#2, [id=#32] AS max_i#3, Subquery subquery#4, [id=#33] AS min_i#5] : :- Subquery subquery#2, [id=#32] : : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 1 +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7]) +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=58] +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0)], output=[max#14]) +- *(1) Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- == Initial Plan == HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7]) +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=19] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0)], output=[max#14]) +- Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] : +- Subquery subquery#4, [id=#33] : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 1 +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[min(i#10)], output=[min(i)#9]) +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=63] +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_min(i#10)], output=[min#15]) +- *(1) Project [i#10] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- == Initial Plan == HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[min(i#10)], output=[min(i)#9]) +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=30] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_min(i#10)], output=[min#15]) +- Project [i#10] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- Scan OneRowRelation[] ``` After introducing the canonicalization, the plan is as following, where you can see **ReusedSubquery** ``` == Parsed Logical Plan == 'Project [scalar-subquery#2 [] AS max_i#3, scalar-subquery#4 [] AS min_i#5] : :- 'Project [unresolvedalias('max('i))] : : +- 'UnresolvedRelation [df], [], false : +- 'Project [unresolvedalias('min('i))] : +- 'UnresolvedRelation [df], [], false +- OneRowRelation == Analyzed Logical Plan == max_i: int, min_i: int Project [scalar-subquery#2 [] AS max_i#3, scalar-subquery#4 [] AS min_i#5] : :- Aggregate [max(i#0) AS max(i)#7] : : +- SubqueryAlias df : : +- View (`df`, [i#0, j#1]) : : +- RelationV2[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 : +- Aggregate [min(i#10) AS min(i)#9] : +- SubqueryAlias df : +- View (`df`, [i#10, j#11]) : +- RelationV2[i#10, j#11] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 +- OneRowRelation == Optimized Logical Plan == Project [scalar-subquery#2 [].max(i) AS max_i#3, scalar-subquery#4 [].min(i) AS min_i#5] : :- Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] : : +- Aggregate [max(i#0) AS max(i)#7, min(i#0) AS min(i)#9] : : +- Project [i#0] : : +- RelationV2[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 : +- Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] : +- Aggregate [max(i#0) AS max(i)#7, min(i#0) AS min(i)#9] : +- Project [i#0] : +- RelationV2[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5 +- OneRowRelation == Physical Plan == AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 0 +- *(1) Project [Subquery subquery#2, [id=#40].max(i) AS max_i#3, ReusedSubquery Subquery subquery#2, [id=#40].min(i) AS min_i#5] : :- Subquery subquery#2, [id=#40] : : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 1 +- *(2) Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0), min(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7, min(i)#9]) +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=71] +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0), partial_min(i#0)], output=[max#16, min#17]) +- *(1) Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- == Initial Plan == Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0), min(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7, min(i)#9]) +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=22] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0), partial_min(i#0)], output=[max#16, min#17]) +- Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] : +- ReusedSubquery Subquery subquery#2, [id=#40] +- *(1) Scan OneRowRelation[] +- == Initial Plan == Project [Subquery subquery#2, [id=#40].max(i) AS max_i#3, Subquery subquery#4, [id=#41].min(i) AS min_i#5] : :- Subquery subquery#2, [id=#40] : : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=true +- == Final Plan == ResultQueryStage 1 +- *(2) Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0), min(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7, min(i)#9]) +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=71] +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0), partial_min(i#0)], output=[max#16, min#17]) +- *(1) Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- == Initial Plan == Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0), min(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7, min(i)#9]) +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=22] +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0), partial_min(i#0)], output=[max#16, min#17]) +- Project [i#0] +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] : +- Subquery subquery#4, [id=#41] : +- AdaptiveSparkPlan isFinalPlan=false : +- Project [named_struct(max(i), max(i)#7, min(i), min(i)#9) AS mergedValue#14] : +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[max(i#0), min(i#0)], output=[max(i)#7, min(i)#9]) : +- Exchange SinglePartition, ENSURE_REQUIREMENTS, [plan_id=37] : +- HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_max(i#0), partial_min(i#0)], output=[max#16, min#17]) : +- Project [i#0] : +- BatchScan class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$$anon$5[i#0, j#1] class org.apache.spark.sql.connector.SimpleDataSourceV2$MyScanBuilder RuntimeFilters: [] +- Scan OneRowRelation[] ``` ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes apache#52529 from yhuang-db/scan-canonicalization. Authored-by: yhuang-db <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Toth <[email protected]>

…int/Dockerfile` building ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to add `libwebp-dev` to fix `dev/spark-test-image/lint/Dockerfile` building in both `master` and `branch-4.1`. ### Why are the changes needed? Currently, `dev/spark-test-image/lint/Dockerfile` fails to build. - For master branch, it wasn't revealed yet because we use the cached image. - For `branch-4.1`, it is currently breaking the CIs. - https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/branch-4.1 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/19015025991/job/54307102990 ``` #9 454.6 -------------------------- [ERROR MESSAGE] --------------------------- #9 454.6 <stdin>:1:10: fatal error: ft2build.h: No such file or directory #9 454.6 compilation terminated. #9 454.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- #9 454.6 ERROR: configuration failed for package 'ragg' #9 454.6 * removing '/usr/local/lib/R/site-library/ragg' ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No behavior change. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. Especially, `Base image build` job. - https://github.com/dongjoon-hyun/spark/actions/runs/19018354185/job/54309542386 ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#52838 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-54140. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

HyukjinKwon force-pushed the test-only-affected-pr branch 4 times, most recently from f369408 to 6424151 Compare July 13, 2020 09:21

HyukjinKwon merged commit 6424151 into master Jul 13, 2020

HyukjinKwon force-pushed the master branch from ccbac3c to 6424151 Compare July 13, 2020 09:21

HyukjinKwon mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2020

[SPARK-32292][SPARK-32252][INFRA] Run the relevant tests only in GitHub Actions apache/spark#29086

Closed

HyukjinKwon deleted the test-only-affected-pr branch July 27, 2020 07:43

HyukjinKwon restored the test-only-affected-pr branch July 27, 2020 07:43

HyukjinKwon deleted the test-only-affected-pr branch July 27, 2020 07:43

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Components test #9

Components test #9

Uh oh!

HyukjinKwon commented Jul 13, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Components test #9

Components test #9

Uh oh!

Conversation

HyukjinKwon commented Jul 13, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants