Skip to content

Conversation

@k163377
Copy link
Contributor

@k163377 k163377 commented May 24, 2025

Failing tests for #5165 -- follow up to #5139 (fixed itself with #5140)

@k163377 k163377 force-pushed the kotlin976-followup branch from 8e1bcc8 to 6f8a8c2 Compare May 24, 2025 05:33
@k163377 k163377 changed the title 【WIP】Add failing tests for #5165 Add failing tests for #5165 May 24, 2025
@k163377 k163377 marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2025 05:34
.defaultSetterInfo(JsonSetter.Value.forContentNulls(Nulls.FAIL))
.build();

assertThrows(
Copy link
Member

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder May 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of this, we already have @JacksonTestFailureExpected annotation, so let's use that.

And tests should be added under tofix package.

Finally, although I like modularity in many ways, in this case it'd be good to combine some if not all tests into single class, to be able to share mapper configuration (esp. since merging to 3.0 requires some work per-class)

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Thank you @k163377 ! I added a note on some changes needed, but tests themselves make sense.

@k163377
Copy link
Contributor Author

k163377 commented Jun 14, 2025

Sorry for leaving this for so long.
I will reissue a PR with a set of behavior fixes and tests.
I will also issue some refactoring PRs separately before fixing it.

@k163377 k163377 closed this Jun 14, 2025
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

@k163377 no problem at all, looking forward to a new PR!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants