Skip to content

Conversation

@arpitbbhayani
Copy link
Contributor

@arpitbbhayani arpitbbhayani commented Mar 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Improved the handling of interrupt signals in interactive (watch) mode to ensure a smoother experience. Users will now benefit from reliable behavior when signaling while in watch mode, with graceful exit management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined the response display logic, resulting in more consistent and clear outputs during interactive sessions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 29, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The change restructures the interrupt signal handling in the Run function of the main module. It consolidates the logic by replacing two channels with a pair of new channels specifically for watch mode. The modified goroutine now directly checks the new channel and updates the exit flag accordingly. Additionally, a nil check in the response rendering function is removed and replaced with a simplified length check. Comments throughout have been updated for clarity in the control flow of watch mode handling.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
ironhawk/main.go - Replaced isWatchMode and sigRouteToWatchMode with watchModeSignal and sigChanWatchMode to simplify signal handling for watch mode.
- Modified goroutine to check the new channel directly and set shouldExitWatchMode flag when a signal is received.
- Updated comments for clarity.
- Removed nil check on resp.VSsMap in renderResponse and simplified to length check.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant OS as OS Signal
    participant SH as Signal Handler Goroutine
    participant WM as Watch Mode Controller

    OS->>SH: Sends interrupt signal
    SH->>SH: Check for watch mode signal
    alt In Watch Mode
        SH->>WM: Forward signal via sigChanWatchMode
        WM->>WM: Set shouldExitWatchMode flag
    else
        SH->>SH: Process signal normally (exit REPL)
    end
Loading

Poem

I’m a rabbit on a coding spree,
Hopping through signals with glee,
Watch mode refined, smooth and neat,
Interrupts are handled oh-so-sweet,
In every line, a rhythmic beat—
Happy hops in our code retreat! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84d4f58 and 5f6261f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ironhawk/main.go (4 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@arpitbbhayani arpitbbhayani merged commit f2a4851 into master Mar 29, 2025
1 check was pending
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants