-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
feat(anthropic): add anthropic beta client support #15441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
|
Bootstrap import analysisComparison of import times between this PR and base. SummaryThe average import time from this PR is: 215 ± 3 ms. The average import time from base is: 220 ± 3 ms. The import time difference between this PR and base is: -4.7 ± 0.1 ms. Import time breakdownThe following import paths have shrunk:
|
Performance SLOsComparing candidate alex/MLOB-4703_anthropic-beta-instrumentation (52be2e8) with baseline main (4753e14) 📈 Performance Regressions (2 suites)📈 iastaspectsospath - 24/24✅ ospathbasename_aspectTime: ✅ 5.017µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -49.8%) vs baseline: 📈 +21.5% Memory: ✅ 40.364MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ ospathbasename_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.080µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -89.2%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 40.265MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ ospathjoin_aspectTime: ✅ 6.072µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -39.3%) vs baseline: -1.9% Memory: ✅ 40.462MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.3%) vs baseline: +5.5% ✅ ospathjoin_noaspectTime: ✅ 2.274µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -77.3%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 40.364MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ ospathnormcase_aspectTime: ✅ 3.452µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -65.5%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 40.482MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ ospathnormcase_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.567µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -94.3%) vs baseline: -0.8% Memory: ✅ 40.383MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ ospathsplit_aspectTime: ✅ 4.709µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -52.9%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 40.364MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ospathsplit_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.591µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 40.305MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ospathsplitdrive_aspectTime: ✅ 3.582µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -64.2%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 40.383MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.5%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ ospathsplitdrive_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.688µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -93.1%) vs baseline: -1.5% Memory: ✅ 40.226MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.9%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ ospathsplitext_aspectTime: ✅ 4.501µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -55.0%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 40.285MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ospathsplitext_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.378µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -86.2%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 40.285MB (SLO: <41.000MB 🟡 -1.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% 📈 telemetryaddmetric - 30/30✅ 1-count-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.413µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -82.9%) vs baseline: 📈 +16.0% Memory: ✅ 34.878MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ 1-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 200.815µs (SLO: <220.000µs -8.7%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.937MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ 1-distribution-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.252µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -83.7%) vs baseline: -1.2% Memory: ✅ 34.878MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ 1-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 215.248µs (SLO: <230.000µs -6.4%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.937MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ 1-gauge-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 2.176µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -89.1%) vs baseline: -0.9% Memory: ✅ 34.859MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 136.071µs (SLO: <150.000µs -9.3%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.819MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.9%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-rate-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.088µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -84.6%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 34.878MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ 1-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 216.397µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -13.4%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 34.918MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 100-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 20.200ms (SLO: <22.000ms -8.2%) vs baseline: -0.8% Memory: ✅ 34.898MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 100-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.256ms (SLO: <2.300ms 🟡 -1.9%) vs baseline: -1.0% Memory: ✅ 35.212MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -0.8%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 100-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 1.410ms (SLO: <1.550ms -9.0%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 34.996MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.4%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ 100-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.208ms (SLO: <2.550ms 📉 -13.4%) vs baseline: -0.7% Memory: ✅ 35.036MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -1.3%) vs baseline: +5.4% ✅ flush-1-metricTime: ✅ 4.471µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -77.6%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 35.212MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -0.8%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ flush-100-metricsTime: ✅ 173.594µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -30.6%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 35.271MB (SLO: <35.500MB 🟡 -0.6%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ flush-1000-metricsTime: ✅ 2.174ms (SLO: <2.500ms 📉 -13.0%) vs baseline: -0.8% Memory: ✅ 36.078MB (SLO: <36.500MB 🟡 -1.2%) vs baseline: +4.9% 🟡 Near SLO Breach (17 suites)🟡 coreapiscenario - 10/10 (1 unstable)
|
Description
Adds auto-instrumentation support for the Anthropic Beta client API (
client.beta.messages.create()andclient.beta.messages.stream()). This extends the existing Anthropic integration to also instrument the beta namespace, which was introduced inanthropic>=0.37.0.Testing
anthropic<0.37.0.Risks
The beta instrumentation is conditionally applied only when the SDK version supports it (
>=0.37.0), so older SDK versions are unaffected.Additional Notes
The beta messages API uses the same request/response structure as the regular messages API and the existing integration code appears to work without any further modification.