-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 457
fix: check git env vars before using the command on the source code integration #14613
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]>
|
Bootstrap import analysisComparison of import times between this PR and base. SummaryThe average import time from this PR is: 273 ± 5 ms. The average import time from base is: 275 ± 7 ms. The import time difference between this PR and base is: -2.2 ± 0.3 ms. Import time breakdownThe following import paths have shrunk:
|
Performance SLOsComparing candidate juanjux/sourcecode-use-git-env-vars (bc12e11) with baseline main (33c9c44) 📈 Performance Regressions (2 suites)📈 iast_aspects - 40/40✅ re_expand_aspectTime: ✅ 32.242µs (SLO: <40.000µs 📉 -19.4%) vs baseline: +1.2% Memory: ✅ 37.179MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.7%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ re_expand_noaspectTime: ✅ 30.205µs (SLO: <40.000µs 📉 -24.5%) vs baseline: +5.5% Memory: ✅ 36.903MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.4%) vs baseline: +3.8% ✅ re_findall_aspectTime: ✅ 2.944µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -70.6%) vs baseline: +1.5% Memory: ✅ 36.884MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.4%) vs baseline: +3.8% ✅ re_findall_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.410µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -85.9%) vs baseline: -1.1% Memory: ✅ 37.061MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.0%) vs baseline: +4.1% ✅ re_finditer_aspectTime: ✅ 4.506µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -54.9%) vs baseline: +1.6% Memory: ✅ 36.923MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.3%) vs baseline: +3.8% ✅ re_finditer_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.407µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -85.9%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.080MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.9%) vs baseline: +4.2% ✅ re_fullmatch_aspectTime: ✅ 2.846µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -71.5%) vs baseline: +7.4% Memory: ✅ 36.884MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.4%) vs baseline: +3.9% ✅ re_fullmatch_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.289µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -87.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.041MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.0%) vs baseline: +4.2% ✅ re_group_aspectTime: ✅ 2.924µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -70.8%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 37.139MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.8%) vs baseline: +4.5% ✅ re_group_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.600µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.0%) vs baseline: +1.0% Memory: ✅ 36.864MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.5%) vs baseline: +3.7% ✅ re_groups_aspectTime: ✅ 3.384µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -66.2%) vs baseline: 📈 +10.4% Memory: ✅ 37.159MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.7%) vs baseline: +4.5% ✅ re_groups_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.700µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -83.0%) vs baseline: -1.0% Memory: ✅ 36.943MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.3%) vs baseline: +3.9% ✅ re_match_aspectTime: ✅ 2.742µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -72.6%) vs baseline: +1.3% Memory: ✅ 37.120MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.8%) vs baseline: +4.4% ✅ re_match_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.289µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -87.1%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 37.100MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.9%) vs baseline: +4.4% ✅ re_search_aspectTime: ✅ 2.558µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -74.4%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 36.982MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.2%) vs baseline: +4.0% ✅ re_search_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.200µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -88.0%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 37.041MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.0%) vs baseline: +4.1% ✅ re_sub_aspectTime: ✅ 3.435µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -65.7%) vs baseline: -0.6% Memory: ✅ 36.962MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.2%) vs baseline: +4.1% ✅ re_sub_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.535µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.7%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.139MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.8%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ re_subn_aspectTime: ✅ 3.934µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -60.7%) vs baseline: +6.6% Memory: ✅ 37.120MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.8%) vs baseline: +4.4% ✅ re_subn_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.622µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -83.8%) vs baseline: +1.8% Memory: ✅ 36.903MB (SLO: <39.000MB -5.4%) vs baseline: +3.8% 📈 iastaspects - 118/118✅ add_aspectTime: ✅ 0.402µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.0%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.238MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ add_inplace_aspectTime: ✅ 0.406µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.9%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ add_inplace_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.324µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.8%) vs baseline: +1.1% Memory: ✅ 37.218MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.6%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ add_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.278µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -97.2%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 37.336MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ bytearray_aspectTime: ✅ 1.312µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -86.9%) vs baseline: -0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.336MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ bytearray_extend_aspectTime: ✅ 1.460µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -85.4%) vs baseline: -0.8% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ bytearray_extend_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.611µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -93.9%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.218MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.6%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ bytearray_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.485µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.1%) vs baseline: +1.1% Memory: ✅ 37.336MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ bytes_aspectTime: ✅ 1.522µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.8%) vs baseline: 📈 +17.3% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ bytes_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.492µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.1%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ bytesio_aspectTime: ✅ 1.347µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -86.5%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 37.238MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ bytesio_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.497µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.0%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ capitalize_aspectTime: ✅ 0.747µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -92.5%) vs baseline: +2.0% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ capitalize_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.438µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.6%) vs baseline: +1.4% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ casefold_aspectTime: ✅ 0.736µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -92.6%) vs baseline: -0.6% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ casefold_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.371µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.3%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ decode_aspectTime: ✅ 0.729µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -92.7%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ decode_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.419µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.8%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 37.159MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.7%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ encode_aspectTime: ✅ 0.706µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -92.9%) vs baseline: -1.3% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ encode_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.401µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.0%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 37.179MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ format_aspectTime: ✅ 3.395µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -66.0%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ format_map_aspectTime: ✅ 3.530µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -64.7%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ format_map_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.775µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -92.2%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ format_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.599µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -94.0%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ index_aspectTime: ✅ 0.357µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.4%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 37.238MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ index_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.275µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -97.3%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ join_aspectTime: ✅ 1.332µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -86.7%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ join_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.492µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ ljust_aspectTime: ✅ 2.551µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -87.2%) vs baseline: -0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ ljust_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.405µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.9%) vs baseline: -0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ lower_aspectTime: ✅ 2.274µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -77.3%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ lower_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.371µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.3%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 37.238MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ lstrip_aspectTime: ✅ 2.238µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -88.8%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ lstrip_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.381µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.2%) vs baseline: -1.7% Memory: ✅ 37.336MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ modulo_aspectTime: ✅ 0.993µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -90.1%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 37.218MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.6%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ modulo_aspect_for_bytearray_bytearrayTime: ✅ 1.530µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.7%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 37.336MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ modulo_aspect_for_bytesTime: ✅ 0.970µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -90.3%) vs baseline: +0.1% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ modulo_aspect_for_bytes_bytearrayTime: ✅ 1.195µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -88.1%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ modulo_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.629µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -93.7%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ replace_aspectTime: ✅ 5.695µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -43.0%) vs baseline: 📈 +15.2% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ replace_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.463µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.4%) vs baseline: +1.3% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ repr_aspectTime: ✅ 0.901µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -91.0%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ repr_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.416µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.8%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ rstrip_aspectTime: ✅ 1.947µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -90.3%) vs baseline: +0.8% Memory: ✅ 37.336MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ rstrip_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.381µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.2%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ slice_aspectTime: ✅ 0.496µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.0%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ slice_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.448µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.5%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ stringio_aspectTime: ✅ 1.551µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -84.5%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ stringio_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.719µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -92.8%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ strip_aspectTime: ✅ 2.259µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -88.7%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ strip_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.388µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.1%) vs baseline: +0.8% Memory: ✅ 37.297MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ swapcase_aspectTime: ✅ 2.493µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -75.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ swapcase_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.539µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -94.6%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ title_aspectTime: ✅ 2.385µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -76.1%) vs baseline: -1.7% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ title_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.505µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -95.0%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 37.277MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ translate_aspectTime: ✅ 3.702µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -63.0%) vs baseline: +9.7% Memory: ✅ 37.316MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ translate_noaspectTime: ✅ 1.040µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -89.6%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ upper_aspectTime: ✅ 2.522µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -74.8%) vs baseline: 📈 +11.0% Memory: ✅ 37.238MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ upper_noaspectTime: ✅ 0.371µs (SLO: <10.000µs 📉 -96.3%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 37.257MB (SLO: <39.000MB -4.5%) vs baseline: +4.9% 🟡 Near SLO Breach (5 suites)🟡 djangosimple - 26/26✅ appsecTime: ✅ 20.447ms (SLO: <22.300ms -8.3%) vs baseline: -0.5% Memory: ✅ 64.409MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.4%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ exception-replay-enabledTime: ✅ 1.347ms (SLO: <1.450ms -7.1%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 63.486MB (SLO: <66.000MB -3.8%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ iastTime: ✅ 20.533ms (SLO: <22.250ms -7.7%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 64.448MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ profilerTime: ✅ 15.228ms (SLO: <16.550ms -8.0%) vs baseline: -0.6% Memory: ✅ 52.809MB (SLO: <53.500MB 🟡 -1.3%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ span-code-originTime: ✅ 26.088ms (SLO: <28.200ms -7.5%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 66.537MB (SLO: <68.500MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ tracerTime: ✅ 20.517ms (SLO: <21.750ms -5.7%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 64.468MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.3%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ tracer-and-profilerTime: ✅ 22.074ms (SLO: <23.500ms -6.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 65.706MB (SLO: <67.000MB 🟡 -1.9%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ tracer-dont-create-db-spansTime: ✅ 19.290ms (SLO: <21.500ms 📉 -10.3%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 64.448MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.4%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ tracer-nativeTime: ✅ 20.443ms (SLO: <21.750ms -6.0%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 65.647MB (SLO: <66.000MB 🟡 -0.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ tracer-no-cachesTime: ✅ 18.453ms (SLO: <19.650ms -6.1%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 64.428MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ tracer-no-databasesTime: ✅ 18.673ms (SLO: <20.100ms -7.1%) vs baseline: -0.9% Memory: ✅ 64.428MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ tracer-no-middlewareTime: ✅ 20.159ms (SLO: <21.500ms -6.2%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 64.428MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ tracer-no-templatesTime: ✅ 20.271ms (SLO: <22.000ms -7.9%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 64.350MB (SLO: <66.000MB -2.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% 🟡 errortrackingdjangosimple - 6/6✅ errortracking-enabled-allTime: ✅ 18.103ms (SLO: <19.850ms -8.8%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 64.428MB (SLO: <65.500MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ errortracking-enabled-userTime: ✅ 18.023ms (SLO: <19.400ms -7.1%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 64.408MB (SLO: <65.500MB 🟡 -1.7%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ tracer-enabledTime: ✅ 18.126ms (SLO: <19.450ms -6.8%) vs baseline: +0.1% Memory: ✅ 64.344MB (SLO: <65.500MB 🟡 -1.8%) vs baseline: +4.8% 🟡 flasksimple - 17/17✅ appsec-getTime: ✅ 4.580ms (SLO: <4.750ms -3.6%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 62.384MB (SLO: <64.500MB -3.3%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ appsec-postTime: ✅ 6.569ms (SLO: <6.750ms -2.7%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 62.285MB (SLO: <64.500MB -3.4%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ appsec-telemetryTime: ✅ 4.582ms (SLO: <4.750ms -3.5%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 62.285MB (SLO: <64.500MB -3.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ debuggerTime: ✅ 1.859ms (SLO: <2.000ms -7.0%) vs baseline: +0.2% Memory: ✅ 44.728MB (SLO: <45.000MB 🟡 -0.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ iast-getTime: ✅ 1.857ms (SLO: <2.000ms -7.1%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 41.622MB (SLO: <49.000MB 📉 -15.1%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ profilerTime: ✅ 1.913ms (SLO: <2.100ms -8.9%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 44.374MB (SLO: <46.500MB -4.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ tracerTime: ✅ 3.376ms (SLO: <3.650ms -7.5%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 51.433MB (SLO: <53.500MB -3.9%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ tracer-nativeTime: ✅ 3.368ms (SLO: <3.650ms -7.7%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 52.691MB (SLO: <53.500MB 🟡 -1.5%) vs baseline: +5.0% 🟡 flasksqli - 6/6✅ appsec-enabledTime: ✅ 3.950ms (SLO: <4.200ms -5.9%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 62.489MB (SLO: <66.000MB -5.3%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ iast-enabledTime: ✅ 2.467ms (SLO: <2.800ms 📉 -11.9%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 58.046MB (SLO: <59.000MB 🟡 -1.6%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ tracer-enabledTime: ✅ 2.082ms (SLO: <2.250ms -7.5%) vs baseline: +0.1% Memory: ✅ 51.208MB (SLO: <53.500MB -4.3%) vs baseline: +4.9% 🟡 otelspan - 22/22✅ add-eventTime: ✅ 45.255ms (SLO: <47.150ms -4.0%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 44.469MB (SLO: <46.500MB -4.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ add-metricsTime: ✅ 321.395ms (SLO: <344.800ms -6.8%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 554.820MB (SLO: <562.000MB 🟡 -1.3%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ add-tagsTime: ✅ 293.509ms (SLO: <314.000ms -6.5%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 555.561MB (SLO: <563.500MB 🟡 -1.4%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ get-contextTime: ✅ 84.585ms (SLO: <92.350ms -8.4%) vs baseline: +2.2% Memory: ✅ 39.677MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -14.7%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ is-recordingTime: ✅ 42.923ms (SLO: <44.500ms -3.5%) vs baseline: -0.2% Memory: ✅ 43.889MB (SLO: <46.500MB -5.6%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ record-exceptionTime: ✅ 61.677ms (SLO: <67.650ms -8.8%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 39.951MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -14.1%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ set-statusTime: ✅ 49.560ms (SLO: <50.400ms 🟡 -1.7%) vs baseline: +1.5% Memory: ✅ 43.902MB (SLO: <46.500MB -5.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ startTime: ✅ 42.264ms (SLO: <43.450ms -2.7%) vs baseline: +0.1% Memory: ✅ 43.888MB (SLO: <46.500MB -5.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ start-finishTime: ✅ 83.179ms (SLO: <88.000ms -5.5%) vs baseline: +0.3% Memory: ✅ 33.777MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -27.4%) vs baseline: +4.5% ✅ start-finish-telemetryTime: ✅ 84.447ms (SLO: <89.000ms -5.1%) vs baseline: -0.3% Memory: ✅ 33.895MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -27.1%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ update-nameTime: ✅ 44.060ms (SLO: <45.150ms -2.4%) vs baseline: -0.4% Memory: ✅ 44.232MB (SLO: <46.500MB -4.9%) vs baseline: +5.0%
|
…ntegration (#14613) The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d2812f2)
…ntegration (#14613) The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d2812f2)
…ntegration (#14613) The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d2812f2)
…ntegration (#14613) The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d2812f2) Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]>
…ntegration (#14613) The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d2812f2) Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]>
…ntegration (#14613) The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit d2812f2) Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]>
…ntegration [backport 3.12] (#14619) Backport d2812f2 from #14613 to 3.12. The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Juanjo Alvarez Martinez <[email protected]>
…ntegration [backport 3.13] (#14620) Backport d2812f2 from #14613 to 3.13. The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Juanjo Alvarez Martinez <[email protected]>
…ntegration [backport 3.14] (#14621) Backport d2812f2 from #14613 to 3.14. The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined `DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH` and `DD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL` for these cases, so check these vars before. ## Checklist - [X] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) Signed-off-by: Juanjo Alvarez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Juanjo Alvarez Martinez <[email protected]>
The sourcecode integration was using git to retrieve the commit hash and repository url. However, we already have defined
DD_GIT_COMMIT_HASH
andDD_GIT_REPOSITORY_URL
for these cases, so check these vars before.Checklist
Reviewer Checklist