Skip to content

Conversation

skwowet
Copy link
Member

@skwowet skwowet commented Dec 12, 2024

… to find data

Changes proposed ✍️

What

copilot:summary

copilot:poem

Why

How

copilot:walkthrough

Checklist ✅

  • Label appropriately with Feature, Improvement, or Bug.
  • Add screenshots to the PR description for relevant FE changes
  • New backend functionality has been unit-tested.
  • API documentation has been updated (if necessary) (see docs on API documentation).
  • Quality standards are met.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced functions to remove raw member and organization merge suggestions.
    • Enhanced error handling in member and organization merging workflows to remove invalid suggestions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of cases where the number of retrieved members or organizations does not meet expectations.
  • Documentation

    • Updated public entity declarations to include new methods for managing merge suggestions.

@skwowet skwowet requested a review from epipav December 12, 2024 14:17
@skwowet skwowet self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce two new functions, removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions and removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions, to manage raw member and organization merge suggestions. These functions are added to their respective modules and are designed to remove specific suggestions based on provided identifiers. Additionally, modifications to the mergeMembersWithLLM and mergeOrganizationsWithLLM workflows have been made to incorporate calls to these new functions when invalid suggestions are detected. The overall structure and logic of existing components remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities.ts Added functions: removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions and removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions.
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/memberMergeSuggestions.ts Added async function: removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions(suggestion: string[]): Promise<void>.
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/organizationMergeSuggestions.ts Added async function: removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(suggestion: string[]): Promise<void>.
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeMembersWithLLM.ts Modified mergeMembersWithLLM to call removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions for invalid suggestions.
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeOrganizationsWithLLM.ts Modified mergeOrganizationsWithLLM to call removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions for invalid suggestions.
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/memberMergeSuggestions.repo.ts Added method: async removeRawMemberSuggestions(suggestion: string[]): Promise<void>.
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/organizationMergeSuggestions.repo.ts Added method: async removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(suggestion: string[]): Promise<void>.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Improvement

Suggested reviewers

  • sausage-todd
  • epipav

Poem

In the burrows deep, where suggestions dwell,
New functions hop in, casting a spell.
They tidy the mess, with a flick of their ear,
Removing the clutter, bringing cheer!
With every merge, a dance they do,
In the world of code, they’re hopping anew! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeOrganizationsWithLLM.ts (1)

52-56: Consider enhancing error logging and monitoring

While the error handling is good, consider adding structured logging with more context and potentially tracking these cleanup operations for monitoring purposes.

-      console.log(
-        `Failed getting organization data in suggestion. Skipping suggestion: ${suggestion}`,
-      )
-      await organizationActivitiesProxy.removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(suggestion)
+      console.log({
+        level: 'warn',
+        message: 'Failed getting organization data in suggestion',
+        suggestion,
+        organizationsFound: organizations.length,
+        action: 'removing_suggestion'
+      })
+      await organizationActivitiesProxy.removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(suggestion)
+      // Consider adding metrics/monitoring here
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeMembersWithLLM.ts (1)

64-68: Consider enhancing error logging and monitoring

Similar to the organization workflow, consider adding structured logging with more context and tracking these cleanup operations.

-      console.log(`Failed getting members data in suggestion. Skipping suggestion: ${suggestion}`)
-      await memberActivitiesProxy.removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions(suggestion)
+      console.log({
+        level: 'warn',
+        message: 'Failed getting members data in suggestion',
+        suggestion,
+        membersFound: members.length,
+        action: 'removing_suggestion'
+      })
+      await memberActivitiesProxy.removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions(suggestion)
+      // Consider adding metrics/monitoring here
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/memberMergeSuggestions.ts (1)

354-360: Add JSDoc documentation and consistent error handling

The new function should follow the documentation and error handling patterns established in the file.

+/**
+ * Removes a raw member merge suggestion from the database
+ * @param suggestion Array containing two member IDs to remove from merge suggestions
+ * @throws Error if the suggestion cannot be removed
+ */
 export async function removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions(suggestion: string[]): Promise<void> {
   const memberMergeSuggestionsRepo = new MemberMergeSuggestionsRepository(
     svc.postgres.writer.connection(),
     svc.log,
   )
-  await memberMergeSuggestionsRepo.removeRawMemberSuggestions(suggestion)
+  try {
+    await memberMergeSuggestionsRepo.removeRawMemberSuggestions(suggestion)
+  } catch (err) {
+    throw new Error(err)
+  }
 }
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/organizationMergeSuggestions.ts (1)

431-437: Consider adding input validation and improving parameter naming.

While the implementation is functionally correct, consider these improvements:

  1. Validate the input array is not empty
  2. Rename parameter from suggestion to organizationIds for clarity
  3. Add JSDoc documentation describing the purpose and parameters

Here's a suggested improvement:

+/**
+ * Removes raw organization merge suggestions for the specified organizations
+ * @param organizationIds - Array of organization IDs to remove from merge suggestions
+ * @throws {Error} If the removal operation fails
+ */
-export async function removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(suggestion: string[]): Promise<void> {
+export async function removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(organizationIds: string[]): Promise<void> {
+  if (!organizationIds?.length) {
+    throw new Error('Organization IDs array cannot be empty');
+  }
   const organizationMergeSuggestionsRepo = new OrganizationMergeSuggestionsRepository(
     svc.postgres.writer.connection(),
     svc.log,
   )
-  await organizationMergeSuggestionsRepo.removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(suggestion)
+  await organizationMergeSuggestionsRepo.removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions(organizationIds)
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a64e377 and d4910b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities.ts (3 hunks)
  • services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/memberMergeSuggestions.ts (1 hunks)
  • services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/organizationMergeSuggestions.ts (1 hunks)
  • services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeMembersWithLLM.ts (1 hunks)
  • services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeOrganizationsWithLLM.ts (1 hunks)
  • services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/memberMergeSuggestions.repo.ts (1 hunks)
  • services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/organizationMergeSuggestions.repo.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities.ts (1)

15-15: LGTM! Clean addition of new activity functions

The new functions removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions and removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions are properly imported and exported.

Also applies to: 25-25, 45-48

services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeOrganizationsWithLLM.ts (1)

54-54: LGTM! Good error handling improvement

The addition of removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions ensures invalid suggestions are cleaned up when organization data cannot be retrieved.

services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeMembersWithLLM.ts (2)

66-66: LGTM! Consistent error handling with organization workflow

The addition of removeRawMemberMergeSuggestions maintains consistency with the organization workflow for cleaning up invalid suggestions.


Line range hint 23-23: Verify the difference in batch sizes between workflows

The member workflow processes 10 suggestions per run while the organization workflow processes 5. Is this difference intentional?

Also applies to: 32-32

✅ Verification successful

The difference in batch sizes appears intentional due to the nature of the entities being processed

The batch size difference between member suggestions (10) and organization suggestions (5) is intentional and reasonable because:

  • Organization merges are typically more complex operations that may involve more data and relationships
  • Members are generally simpler entities with fewer dependencies
  • The codebase consistently shows different batch sizes for organization vs member operations across various services (e.g., in sync services, cleanup operations)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any configuration or documentation that might explain the batch size differences
rg -i "suggestions.*per.*run|batch.*size" --type ts

Length of output: 9199

services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/activities/organizationMergeSuggestions.ts (2)

431-437: LGTM! The function integrates well with the existing workflow.

The new function follows established patterns in the codebase and properly complements the existing getRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions functionality. It correctly uses the writer connection for mutations and maintains consistency with error handling patterns.


431-437: Verify the usage of this new function.

Let's confirm how this function is being used in the mergeWithLLM workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:

Function is properly used in the mergeWithLLM workflow

The removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions function is correctly integrated and used in the mergeOrganizationsWithLLM.ts workflow. It's specifically used to clean up invalid suggestions where the number of organizations doesn't match the expected count (2), preventing processing of malformed data.

  • Used in services/apps/merge_suggestions_worker/src/workflows/mergeOrganizationsWithLLM.ts
  • Properly exported in activities.ts
  • Implementation matches the repository layer in organizationMergeSuggestions.repo.ts
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find where removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions is being used

# Search for direct usage of the function
echo "Searching for direct usage of removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions..."
rg -l "removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions"

# Search for the workflow file mentioned in the PR
echo "Searching for the mergeWithLLM workflow file..."
fd -t f "mergeOrganizationsWithLLM"

# If found, show the context of usage
echo "Showing usage context if found..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 "removeRawOrganizationMergeSuggestions"

Length of output: 6985

@skwowet skwowet merged commit 6768c18 into main Dec 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@skwowet skwowet deleted the bugfix/LFX-1845 branch December 13, 2024 15:27
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2025
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants