Skip to content

merge : commit update #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 22, 2022
Merged

Conversation

CEOJINSUNG
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

mustafasrepo and others added 9 commits October 15, 2022 06:34
* Add support to for INTERVAL inside window queries

* Remove the unnecessary ancillary struct Interval

* Convert Window Frame Bound to Expr

* remove unnecessary changes

* remove unnecessary changes

Co-authored-by: Mehmet Ozan Kabak <[email protected]>
* feat: support cache/uncache table syntax

* fix: support the full cache table syntax
…[(p)]`. (#671)

Add tests for both and `CLOB[(p)]`.
* Add ObjectType Sequence

* Drop sequence test cases added.

* Parser and Drop statement Display updated.

* Parser and Drop statement Display updated.

* Fix compile errors

* add new test case
… (partial). (#665)

Theoretically the behavior should be the same as CREATE INDEX, but we
cannot make that assumption, so the parse is (almost) identical as the
input.

Breaking changes:
- Now HASH and BTREE are KEYWORDS, and using them as names can result in
  errors.
- Now 'KEY' and 'INDEX' column names start the parsing of a table constraint if unquoted for the Generic dialect. This results in possible conficts if canonical results are compared for all dialects if a column is named 'key' without quotes.
* feat: add support for custom types with argument

* refactor: add support for number and string as type arguments

* fix: ignore CustomWithArgs when parsing TypedString

* refactor: merge CustomWithArgs into Custom

* refactor: rename arguments to modifiers
@CEOJINSUNG CEOJINSUNG merged commit a7322d4 into CEOJINSUNG:feature/on-update Oct 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants