[Cherry pick] Table name collision bug fix (#1990) #2065
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
## Why make this change? Closes #1908 ## What is this change? We were previously filling the schema information for the entity data set but only using the table name. We add in the schema name to deconflict between two tables with the same name in different schemas. This means that we retrieve information from the entity data set by using schema and tablename when schema is available, and just the table name otherwise. The reason that we do not need to worry about collisions at the schema and table name level (eg. where we have the same schema and table names within different databases) is because this entity data set is a part of the SqlMetadataProvider, and we have a SqlMetadataProvider for each database (not database type but actual DBs). ## How was this tested? A regression test with a collision between table names in different schemas was added. We also update the unit test for SqlMetadatProvider. ## Sample Request(s) see #1908
seantleonard
requested review from
Aniruddh25,
JelteF,
Mathos1432,
aaronburtle,
aaronpowell,
abhishekkumams,
ayush3797,
gledis69,
mbhaskar,
milismsft,
ravishetye,
severussundar and
tarazou9
as code owners
Contributor
Author
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Aniruddh25
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
Collaborator
Aniruddh25
left a comment
Aniruddh25
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for the port
aaronburtle
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Collaborator
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry picks to
release/0.11frommainWhy make this change?
Closes #1908
What is this change?
We were previously filling the schema information for the entity data set but only using the table name. We add in the schema name to deconflict between two tables with the same name in different schemas. This means that we retrieve information from the entity data set by using schema and tablename when schema is available, and just the table name otherwise.
The reason that we do not need to worry about collisions at the schema and table name level (eg. where we have the same schema and table names within different databases) is because this entity data set is a part of the SqlMetadataProvider, and we have a SqlMetadataProvider for each database (not database type but actual DBs).
How was this tested?
A regression test with a collision between table names in different schemas was added. We also update the unit test for SqlMetadatProvider.