Skip to content

Conversation

@feng-j678
Copy link
Contributor

@feng-j678 feng-j678 commented Mar 14, 2025

This release includes:
[x]Support Ubuntu 20.04 for esm / pro client #292
[x]Fix the version comparator bug for ubuntu pro client version extraction #294
[x]Apt - fix for non-sec updates getting misclassified & related tmp cleanup #295

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.43%. Comparing base (d08cec9) to head (1fc5289).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #297   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.43%   92.43%           
=======================================
  Files          97       97           
  Lines       16226    16226           
=======================================
  Hits        14999    14999           
  Misses       1227     1227           
Flag Coverage Δ
python27 92.43% <100.00%> (ø)
python39 92.43% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

B
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/Azure/LinuxPatchExtension into update/lpe_v1_6_58
pull master changes
@kjohn-msft
Copy link
Collaborator

@feng-j678 we don't need this because #294 contains #296 -- "[x] [OE PR Comments] Version Comparator Comments as Code on PR Branch #296"

@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft changed the title Update/lpe v1 6 58 LPE Release 1.6.58 Mar 14, 2025
@feng-j678 feng-j678 force-pushed the update/lpe_v1_6_58 branch from be06e4a to dbc7a42 Compare March 14, 2025 21:17
@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft merged commit cb5eb95 into master Mar 14, 2025
7 checks passed
@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft deleted the update/lpe_v1_6_58 branch March 14, 2025 21:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants