Skip to content

Conversation

@azdanov
Copy link
Contributor

@azdanov azdanov commented May 31, 2025

📑 Description

Added a section on how to add spring-boot support to the pack.

ℹ Additional Information

@github-actions
Copy link

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

  • If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

  • If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

  • Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

  • README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

  • Entry returns a single plugin spec with the new plugin as the only top level spec (not applicable for recipes or packs).

  • Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

  • Proper usage of specs table for all specs that are not dependencies of a given plugin (not applicable for recipes or packs).

@azdanov azdanov requested a review from Copilot May 31, 2025 14:27
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Adds documentation for enabling Spring Boot support in the Java community pack.

  • Introduces a new "Spring Boot" section with a sample Lua plugin configuration.
  • Notes the need to install the spring-boot-tools extension.

@azdanov azdanov requested a review from a team June 1, 2025 03:29
@Uzaaft
Copy link
Member

Uzaaft commented Jun 1, 2025

Cant this be a seperate pack?

@azdanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

azdanov commented Jun 1, 2025

Cant this be a seperate pack?

Yeah I think so. It does need jdtls to work, but otherwise could be useful as a separate one.

@azdanov azdanov closed this Jun 1, 2025
@azdanov azdanov deleted the azdanov-patch-1 branch June 1, 2025 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants